Who is going to be the scapegoat this week? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Who is going to be the scapegoat this week?

the claw said:
just great to see them play with heart and determination last three weeks. no bagging from me this week the obvious weaknesses are there for all to see but they gave it their best shot its all we can ask play with pride and have a red hot go. keep playing this way keep running keep chasing hassling tackling at times play with system ill be happy.
we have a fair way to go people but at last we are being fairly represented.

i thought wallace coached well again but personally would have given the more robust schulz the job on roughhead all day.

its obvious we need a fair few bigger harder bodies in tight we need a strapping kpd a big combative kpf and a 200cm plus ruckman.

as mcmahons biggest critic i was pleased with his overall game and yes was disappointed with a few defensive efforts and turnovers but in the main was good. a few tagging roles may teach jordy a thing or two. 4 or 5 kg wouldnt go astray either.

last but not least keep bringing the kids thru terry theres 3 or 4 good ones in the wings.

Don't always agree with you claw, but great post.
 
Abe Simpson said:
Tambling. He just never does enough...

How many defensive efforts did Flanklin put in yesterday? How many goal assists? The bloke is a selfish prick who will be a cancer to Hawthorn over his career..he'll be a divisive factor IMO.

I actually think Tambling was more effective in yesterday's game than Flanklin. He didn't have as many scoring shots but was more effective defensively and around the ground.

Buddy is still brushing poo out of his hair because Kel Moore shitted all over him yesterday.
 
BrisTiger24 said:
How many defensive efforts did Flanklin put in yesterday? How many goal assists? The bloke is a selfish prick who will be a cancer to Hawthorn over his career..he'll be a divisive factor IMO.

I actually think Tambling was more effective in yesterday's game than Flanklin. He didn't have as many scoring shots but was more effective defensively and around the ground.

Buddy is still brushing poo out of his hair because Kel Moore sh!tted all over him yesterday.
Franklin was in the top 10 for tackles in the forward 50 last year. Dont hate a bloke because he has pretty boy supporters who immortalise him and continually put down our recruiting
 
Lonthalion said:
Franklin was in the top 10 for tackles in the forward 50 last year. Dont hate a bloke because he has pretty boy supporters who immortalise him and continually put down our recruiting

He had one tackle yesterday, despite the high number of inside 50s.
 
Hyde is the scapegoat this week, Wallet will keep rotating these two. :hihi


IN- Tivendale

OUT- Hyde
 
I think Hyde did very little yesterday and did turn it over a few times. Also was Newman carrying an injury? Started on the bench and had no impact at all. I'd say for this week Out: Hyde In: Bowden/Connors.
 
Coughlan24 said:
I think Hyde did very little yesterday and did turn it over a few times. Also was Newman carrying an injury? Started on the bench and had no impact at all. I'd say for this week Out: Hyde In: Bowden/Connors.

can't see them putting Connors in when they don't consider him good enough to play for Coburg seniors.

There is nothing wrong with rotating players - Hyde is the sort of guy that can come in and kick 2 or 3 goals - each week he becomes less effective - they plan for him.
Then its time to bring somene else in. That is where we are at now.
 
Digglers Ghost said:
Hey frosty, has Sanchez slept with your Mrs?? ;D :P



Casper, maybe that's my problem, I don't have one, so there's no-one to go home too and take my frustrations out on.

I seriously doubt whether the bloke could get that close to another Human being, it would mean CONTACT, so he's probably doing as well as me in that Department.