Who is the leak?

[NZtiger]

I find it quite interesting that so many people believe that they know exactly what has taken place, purely because they've read a story from a reporter. I think people need to remove their collective fingers from the trigger until it is beyond doubt that a particular individual is responsible - in which case we can have ourselves a good old-fashioned stoning.

 

[IanG]

I find it quite interesting that so many people believe that they know exactly what has taken place, purely because they've read a story from a reporter. I think people need to remove their collective fingers from the trigger until it is beyond doubt that a particular individual is responsible - in which case we can have ourselves a good old-fashioned stoning.

Its not coming from 1 reporter.

 

[pahoffm]

So many differing posts, so many differing scapegoats.

:-\

 

[NZtiger]

So many differing posts, so many differing scapegoats.

:-\

You beat me to it Phantom.

Its not coming from 1 reporter.

That may be true Ian but does that make it... true?

And if you read the entire thread many names have been thrown up? These stories have come from a variety of stories from a variety of journos and as a result there are several people who are apparently responsible. This I find hard to believe. Is it possible for everone be right???

 

[Chocco]

You have seen them?

Yep I work at Optus ;D

 

[pahoffm]

You beat me to it Phantom.

Yeh!

Let's just line all the scapegoats up against a wall and machine gun 'em all.

That way we can say we think we got the right one.

Or did we?

 

[brigadiertiger]

Its not coming from 1 reporter.

I just said in another thread for all we know the different reporters are getting it fromthe same leak. The person doing the leaking has their story confirmed by multiple reporters but they are unaware that it is coming from the same person.