Ugly game or not, I'm heading up there to see us take the 4 points. ;D :gotigersskybeau said:Tigers of Old said:Good God it's going to be an ugly game.
Can visualize it already.![]()
Good thing its being televised, eh? :-\
![]()
Ugly game or not, I'm heading up there to see us take the 4 points. ;D :gotigersskybeau said:Tigers of Old said:Good God it's going to be an ugly game.
Can visualize it already.![]()
Good thing its being televised, eh? :-\
![]()
Tigers of Old said:Leysy Days said:Tigers of Old said:Leysy Days said:jb03 said:I'll tell ya its Ryan O'Keefe, I'd like to see Raines get the job. (it will get him up the ground & into the play more where we can use his drive.
I think O'Keefe will be too strong for Raines in the air. O'Keefe 190cm(from Swans website), Rainesy 182cm.
O'Keefe gave Newmo a footy lesson last time the teams met. Too tall. Rainsey is even shorter than Chris. :-\
Polo would be my pick to tag O'Keefe.
O'Keefe is listed at 187cm or 188cm on various other listings.........
Besides he beats players with long searching leads & is the link to the full forward line moreso than contested marks in forward 50. He beat Newman because he was too quick on the lead. (when Newman gets neat this is also normally the reason.)
Besides Polo is required for Goodes who MUST have a man. If given a hard tag he can throw the towel in. When allowed to fo his own thing he can tear games apart.
I guess we'll have to disagree Leysy.
IMO as great as Dean's been this year I think Goodes is too big and strong for Polo.
This isn't Buddy Franklin coming back from injury we are talking about.
Goodes is virtually a ruckman, he's deceptively big.
As much as some here wouldn't advocate it. If he's fit I'd bring Rayzor back to play on Goodes.
This is what I'd do, all this depends on Joel of course.
R Hall - Goodes
Gaspar - B.Hall
Raines - Fosdike
Polo - O'Keefe
White - Schneider
Kellaway - O'Loughlin
P Bowden - Loose in defence
It'll be interesting to see what defensive matchups TW goes with. 8)
Leysy Days said:Tigers of Old said:Leysy Days said:Tigers of Old said:Leysy Days said:jb03 said:Yeah we're on different wavelengths here TOOheys.
IMO Goodes aint no KPP, he's an outside athletic wingman. You need a fit midfielder to play on him.
Hall is no chance IMO, having not played for what 3 weeks or so there is no way he'll have the fitness base to run with Goodes.
I still reckon Polo will get the gig with Moore the other outside chance.
hopper said:The Richo idea is farcical imho. His field kicking and decision making in defence are appalling.
Tigers of Old said:I was of the impression Hall is a way off yet?
Ian4 said:hopper said:The Richo idea is farcical imho. His field kicking and decision making in defence are appalling.
disagree. richo's field kicking is usually excellent
bairdy380 said:Richo on Goodes just wont work....Goodes will prob drag him to the swans fwd line, and richo in defence....it just doesnt work....you can physically see him thinking, what to do, where to postion etc...
jb03 said:A lot of defensive match ups. Where are our onballers that the opposition must shut down. We really don't have any.
On top of which we are sans Cogs and Newman who we had at the last outing.jb03 said:A lot of defensive match ups. Where are our onballers that the opposition must shut down. We really don't have any.
ya know shers as much as i hate gaspar i concede hes pretty good negater. if hall plays ff *smile* should take him if he starts at chf moore.personally i would like knobel to be fit which would enable simmonds to play in the hole down back much like brendan gale used to.Shers said:This may not be answering the question of who plays CHB, but more answering who plays B.Hall.
Gaspar to play on Hall, purely as defensive as possible, as opposed to Bowden, who's offensive qualities are great, but has struggled a bit in recent times defensively.
For all Gaspar's faults, which are basically of the offensive variety, I still think he is great defensively.
Hyde is being asked to fill this role. Expect Petts to spend more time down back too.SCOOP said:Our skill and running from the back half is super thin. Could be time to give Lids a HBF.
GoodOne said:Ian4 said:hopper said:The Richo idea is farcical imho. His field kicking and decision making in defence are appalling.
disagree. richo's field kicking is usually excellent
Seriously? Richo's kicking and handballs are usually appalling (good last week though). I remember the Adelaide match, we held the ball for minutes until it was passed to Richo. Of course his kick turned it over. Someone so inconsistent kicking for goal is generally going to have problems with consistency in kicking in general as well. Love the old fella but Richo at half-back is a disaster waiting to happen.
Spot on,we have seen our costly some of Richo's ventures down to the backline can be.Keep him in the forwardline.Tubytiger said:Richo down back would be a disaster. Honestly the thought of it makes me shudder - the swans would be rubbing their hands with glee at the thought.