Why all this talk on delisting youngers?

[mb64]

Those calling for the Archies, Roachies, Gilmores, Moores ect to get the ass are some of the same people who rate Hilton, Hall, Pettifer Tivendale and the Chaff.
Think about that it is frightening it really is.

Agree Craig,No logic when you want to get rid of kids & retain hacks who have kept us near the bottom of the ladder.

 

[Bill James]

Those calling for the Archies, Roachies, Gilmores, Moores ect to get the ass are some of the same people who rate Hilton, Hall, Pettifer Tivendale and the Chaff.
Think about that it is frightening it really is.

How foolish those people are Craig, why dont you tell us how more efficient and skilled Archibald would be as a forward compared to Pettifer, or how hard and composed Roach would be on a half back flank as opposed to Hilton or how many more possessions than Tivendale that ball magnet Gilmour would get.  Tell us how the fact that they struggle at VFL level actually means that they will star at AFL level.  Lucky we have footy geniuses like you setting us straight Craigeee!!!!

Go Lamby. I am not for delisting any of the four mentioned but think all of them have a long way to go before they reach the level of dud. For which the definition seems to be average AFL player capable of playing 100 games.