Not until Vlad returns from holidays.Freezer said:Any idea when we'll know?
Opulentus Tigris said:With one year to go on the TabCorp sponsorship, tough global economic conditions and the possibility of Richmond not having a 2nd major sponsor, the AFL cannot reject this proposal. IMO. The AFL can afford to breach any of their contract conditions with TabCorp and should compensate them for that breach. Particularly if it will benefit a Melbourne based club.
This is a massive litmus test for the AFL and they will be opening pandoras box if this ends up costing our club a major sponsor. We'll see how well the AFL is looking after the interests of the Melbourne based clubs.
Opulentus Tigris said:With one year to go on the TabCorp sponsorship, tough global economic conditions and the possibility of Richmond not having a 2nd major sponsor, the AFL cannot reject this proposal. IMO. The AFL can afford to breach any of their contract conditions with TabCorp and should compensate them for that breach. Particularly if it will benefit a Melbourne based club.
This is a massive litmus test for the AFL and they will be opening pandoras box if this ends up costing our club a major sponsor. We'll see how well the AFL is looking after the interests of the Melbourne based clubs.
BiddiscombeSkills said:Assuming of course that the AFL has a choice. If there's an exclusivity clause in their contract with TabCorp, and TabCorp don't want to lose their exclusivity... well, the rest isn't exactly rocket science.
Given the prevailing economic conditions and the number of clubs in severe financial strife, the fact the deal has not immediately been rubber-stamped by the AFL tells me that TabCorp are saying 'no dice'.
grumpytiger said:....which makes it even worse that a decision hasn't been made. If there is an exclusivity clause then it was there before christmas when the club first started negotiating the deal. Why drag it out. CLOWNS
Leysy Days said:Leysy may well be wrong, but he's not so sure its necesarilly the AFL holding things up.