-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Would we take Didak
- Thread starter premiers2011
- Start date
what did he do wrong. as far as i can see he got pissed and was a passenger in a car that was driven by a drunk driver. i know lets hang him from the nearest tree we can find.
he then told a lie about being in the car because of the way it would look. i know lets draw and quarter him while wer'e at it.
evos right nancies everywhere.
he then told a lie about being in the car because of the way it would look. i know lets draw and quarter him while wer'e at it.
evos right nancies everywhere.
the claw said:
If you were the person that he lied to who made you look like a complete fool you might think a little differently of him.
I been thinking about this whilst driving around the Wimmera. Didak is a brilliant footballer and has freakish skills. He can find space and he gets to the foot of the packs where crumbers should be. He has pace, can kick a goal , and works hard. I am sure that if he has some pride in his performance as a footballer then he has something to prove. Yes I would have him in the side. He is still young enough to be around for quite a few years yet, he can help the young kids...and really....is having a few, well one or two more than a few, a week out from a game a seriously bad thing?
Yes I would but I wouldnt give the earth for him.
Yes I would but I wouldnt give the earth for him.
the claw said:
lol. You are full of it claw. What did he do wrong?
- Lied to his skipper.
- Lied his team mates.
- Lied to the Coach.
- lied to the CEO.
- Embarrassed the club
- p!ssed off the sponsors
- Angered & embarrassed just about everyone associated with Scumwood
- Jeapardised the younger Shaw's career
- Jeopardised his team's finals chances
This all despite previous history and warnings..
Imagine if he played for Richmond?
You would no doubt want him hung drawn and quartered beyond recognition.
Call me a nancie if you like :-* but at least I am not a hypocrite.
Trade rumours from 2003 :hihi
- - - - - -
Nick Stevens to Collingwood, Port want Didak and one other player (quick half-back preferably)
Nathan Bassett to Western Bulldogs to join his brother, Nathan Brown to Richmond and Matt Richardson to Adelaide in a three-way swap with draft picks
Misiti to Carlton in a deal involving Matt Allan going to Essendon
Croad back to a Victorian club for a second round draft pick
Jon Hay to Adelaide for first or second round draft pick and a player
http://www2b.abc.net.au/grandstand/afl/newposts/27/topic27223.shtm
- - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Nick Stevens to Collingwood, Port want Didak and one other player (quick half-back preferably)
Nathan Bassett to Western Bulldogs to join his brother, Nathan Brown to Richmond and Matt Richardson to Adelaide in a three-way swap with draft picks
Misiti to Carlton in a deal involving Matt Allan going to Essendon
Croad back to a Victorian club for a second round draft pick
Jon Hay to Adelaide for first or second round draft pick and a player
http://www2b.abc.net.au/grandstand/afl/newposts/27/topic27223.shtm
- - - - - - -
Would depend on what price Collingwood was to ask for. That is assuming they want to trade him. All he is guilty of in this instance is telling the club a lie and I don't think he would do that again in a hurry especially if they get rid of him.
brigadiertiger said:
I haven't discounted picking him up despite my tirade at clawsy.
I'd certainly take him over a drug addict that's for sure.
My point is more that I can see exactly why the Pies have thrown the book at him in this instance.
If they do punt him he'd be extremely foolish to get mixed up in something again but he has shown he's a fool on more than one occasion now.. it will not be without some risk.
What do you reckon the Scum would want for him in return brigadier?
drug addict, alcoholic ( a chronic binge drinker is an alcoholic) what's the difference.
He'd only been off his curfew for 16 days!!!
He'd only been off his curfew for 16 days!!!
Tigers of Old said:I haven't discounted picking him up despite my tirade at clawsy.
I'd certainly take him over a drug addict that's for sure.
My point is more that I can see exactly why the Pies have thrown the book at him in this instance.
If they do punt him he'd be extremely foolish to get mixed up in something again but he has shown he's a fool on more than one occasion now.. it will not be without some risk.
What do you reckon the Scum would want for him in return brigadier?
Honestly I think it will depend on how much he has pissed off Eddie. They may be willing to take a second round pick and I am not sure about the draft so don't know if that is to high a price considering we are looking at a mid second round pick. Third and Meyer I would be happy with ;D
Reality is Collingwood will ask way to much for him and probably manage to bully Melbourne into paying it.
premiers08 said:
Hmmm...fair point when you look at it like that.
I think Didak's situation pretty well mimics Fevola's. Good player but do you carry the baggage? That's becoming increasingly difficult these days.
The demon drink ain't a great mix for Al. He'd do well to keep off it during the season.
brigadiertiger said:
Depends how badly they want to get rid of him I guess.
Have I got it all wrong? I thought there was a rule in place stating that when a player has signed a new contract that it was "illegal" for them to be traded to another club in the first year of that contract. Could have sworn there was a rule in place stipulating this.