Would we take Didak | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Would we take Didak

But Daicos, the freakishly talented forward who led the Magpies' goalkicking in their most recent premiership year, 1990, said Didak, the player considered to be the nearest thing to his modern equivalent, should be retained.

"Without doubt I'd keep him. He's 25, I think he's their best player by a mile," Daicos told radio station SEN yesterday.


But not good enough for our list if the PRE brains trust are to be believed.
 
Looks great in a collingwood jumper , really suits him, that no front teeth mouthguard makes him look the genuine article too.

Even the thought of that scumbag defiling our jumper makes me want to puke. going to a game , and seeing him run out for us, would be akin to alexs' aversion therapy in " a clockwork orange"

There I'd be , puking , crying, unable to close my eyes, while " I've got to learn to make better judgements in certain situations......" running incessantly through my head, unable to avert my eyes. Shiver.

rat -tail -wearing, elvis- karate kicking- while on the deck- to avoid a tackle -dog, go and crap on someone elses nature strip, and leave our sacred turf alone.
 
evo said:
But not good enough for our list if the PRE brains trust are to be believed.
I doubt whether many PREnders would knock back Alan Didak the footballer.....however there is more to him than football and it is his extra curricular activities that would make people shy away from him. Daicos appears to be prepared to forgive his off field indiscretions because he is a good footballer....and that type of thinking has been shared by the scum over the years, leading to this cultural issues they have now.

He might improve the team on the ground in the short term, but may do longer term damage to the fabric of the club. No thanks.
 
Tigers of Old said:
I haven't discounted picking him up despite my tirade at clawsy. ;)
I'd certainly take him over a drug addict that's for sure.
My point is more that I can see exactly why the Pies have thrown the book at him in this instance.

If they do punt him he'd be extremely foolish to get mixed up in something again but he has shown he's a fool on more than one occasion now.. it will not be without some risk.

What do you reckon the Scum would want for him in return brigadier?
you call that a tirade. sheesh this thread gets softer by the minute. :hihi
 
Tigers of Old said:
I haven't discounted picking him up despite my tirade at clawsy. ;)
I'd certainly take him over a drug addict that's for sure.
My point is more that I can see exactly why the Pies have thrown the book at him in this instance.

If they do punt him he'd be extremely foolish to get mixed up in something again but he has shown he's a fool on more than one occasion now.. it will not be without some risk.

What do you reckon the Scum would want for him in return brigadier?
As usual you don't know what you think.