Broad deliberate rushed behind

[Quickdraw]

To the letter of the law the decision can be justified BUT.............

There have been plenty of instances where this and more blatant examples have been let go.

All we ask is consistency.

Also, Broady could have disguised it far better.

 

[Jason King]

To the letter of the law the decision can be justified BUT.............

There have been plenty of instances where this and more blatant examples have been let go.

All we ask is consistency.

Also, Broady could have disguised it far better.

Yeah I'm not sure it gets paid 5 times out of 10. Broady needed to do better. A dump kick was the better option.

 

[TT33]

Yeah I'm not sure it gets paid 5 times out of 10. Broady needed to do better. A dump kick was the better option.

A dump kick would have probably bounced at right angles & he'd then get nailed for "insufficient intent".
You know its true. :

 

[craig]

Effwit would have been screaming blue murder if it was the Cats.

No way known that was paid against the Sun$.

Doesn't fit the narrative.

Guaranteed it wouldnt be paid against Moore or Maynard either

 

[YinnarTiger]

Punctuation.

The semi-colons, line-feeds and a single "or" in the way the rule is presented is a bit confusing.

With the clause: "If A, B, C or D then..,,,", I would accept = true if any one of A, B, C or D is true.

 

[KnightersRevenge]

Punctuation.

The semi-colons, line-feeds and a single "or" in the way the rule is presented is a bit confusing.

With the clause: "If A, B, C or D then..,,,", I would accept = true if any one of A, B, C or D is true.

Or even better replace the "," with "or" or "and" and remove all ambiguity.