-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Pick 53: Jack Graham
- Thread starter puregreen
- Start date
Matt Rendall saying that the only smart option for Graham is to go. He believes with our developing midfield he could find himself out of the side within 2 seasons.
He suggested Graham plus pick 19 for Ports pick 8 would be fair.
What do our resident experts think?
Well there is one destination where a newly appointed coach would know exactly what Soldo is capable of or not?
Probably doesn't have a lot of currency but if it can help in the Hopper/Tarranto trade then could benefit both clubs but we wouldn't want Nank to struggle or go down.
Last edited:
Pick 19 and 8 swap only values Graham about picks 31/32, not high enough I would think for Jack's value.
I was more inclined for something like this -
Port's pick 8 and Graham for our pick 30.
Pick 8 points (1551) minus our pick 30 (629 points) = 922 points.
So 922 points values Jack about pick 19/20. (Pick 19 is worth 948 points and pick 20 is 912 points).
That's a fairer value for him. CCJ went for pick 20, so no way is Rendell's pick swap acceptable in comparison to the Jones boy!!
When fit he does his job to the best of his ability, he's a good club person, causes no troubles, improves your club culture.
Then we can go to the Giants with our 12 and 19 picks and Soldo for Taranto and Hopper.
So our draft pick has risen from 12 up to pick 8 and we have gained two hard nut mids.
Then Bullis might sleep better at night
because with pick 8 we might be able to draft a Jefferson or Cadman to develop under Lynch and Jack next year.Cadman is looking like a top 5 pick though, but Jefferson around top 15 should be more getable with a pick 8.
Worst comes to worst Giants can have the pick 8 and 19, but with no Soldo. We'll keep the pick 12 and Jefferson might still be getable.
Taranto 23.42dis .47gls
Cotchin 22.94 .40 gls
So Tarranto has his best ahead of him,A grade player.
Cotchin 22.94 .40 gls
So Tarranto has his best ahead of him,A grade player.
I say keep him. Get him to 100 games plus, he will be more destructive once both T & H come in, Cotch will not play all games next season.
This will make him more valuable and have better currency.
This will make him more valuable and have better currency.
7 news showed vision of Graham walking with Hinkley, presumably touring Ports facilities.
“GORNE”
The bottom line is he is nowhere near capable of replacing catch and dusty , perhaps we foresee a potential haggle over a contract next year that we don’t wish to step up to , there are several reasons I expect that this will come to fruition , $ , picks and a spot in the side we may wish to open up for a couple coming thru
Richmond star caught out visiting rival club after saying he was visiting family
Richmond star caught out visiting rival AFL club after saying he was visiting family
www.foxsports.com.au
Not sure how to do the link, but its the above
Have a think about when you have kids. Do you want to bring them up away from family?
Graham and 19 for an 11 pick upgrade? Are you guys serious? I'd rather keep him.
If Shocking can get a job at AFL and make rules favorable to the PussiesBut Jack has only played 97 games, so can any deal be put on hold until after he plays three more games next year?
Benny can change it so after 97games your kids can be drafted under father son rule
So what do u think he is worth without swapping picks?
My reckoning pick 12 to pick 20
I agree, but we don't tend to stand in a player's way if he wants to leave. If Graham declares an intention to get to Port, we'll get him there (probably to our detriment).
