Points value of National Draft picks | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Points value of National Draft picks

Dyer'ere

Licensed to kazoo
Sep 21, 2004
19,259
7,417
This is the way it goes -

Code:
1	3000
2	2517
3	2234
4	2034
5	1878
6	1751
7	1644
8	1551
9	1469
10	1395
11	1329
12	1268
13	1212
14	1161
15	1112
16	1067
17	1025
18	985
19	948
20	912
21	878
22	845
23	815
24	785
25	756
26	729
27	703
28	677
29	653
30	629
31	606
32	584
33	563
34	542
35	522
36	502
37	483
38	465
39	446
40	429
41	412
42	395
43	378
44	362
45	347
46	331
47	316
48	302
49	287
50	273
51	259
53	246
54	233
55	220
56	207
57	194
58	182
59	170
60	158
61	146
63	135
66	123
68	112
69	101
70	90
71	80
 

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,908
11,921
Two arms, two legs n one head. I know there's some variation in ability n capacity for all the young draftees, but pick one being worth two pick eights just seems skewed out of proportion.

So does trading off a couple of excess fringe players for a bunch picks around the thirties n forties so that you can basically buy a top ten pick for garbage.

More of the intellectual diarrhoea from AFL corporate suits desperately trying to justify their existence.
What was ever wrong with trading a like for like? You want an early pick, you need to trade quality. Now you just sell garbage to accumulate points n use them to syphon cream.
 

Rosy

Tiger Legend
Mar 27, 2003
54,348
31
Footy is too hard to follow these days. I don't get it. :pullhair
 

Willo

Tiger Legend
Oct 13, 2007
18,775
6,697
Aldinga Beach
Just a note if you're using the above table.
Pick 31 is 606 points so pick 32 can't be the same.
Pick 32 is actually 584 points
 

Harry

Tiger Legend
Mar 2, 2003
24,592
12,187
This is one of the biggest scams the afl has pulled but people are refusing to see how this was designed purely to assist the new clubs.
 

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,908
11,921
Harry said:
This is one of the biggest scams the afl has pulled but people are refusing to see how this was designed purely to assist the new clubs.
Yep.
Massive overdose of all the best young talent at the draft to set them up. Then they get a couple of years to assess n develop the best kids while offering up the leftovers that were quality juniors but aren't quite matching their best for plenty of bonus points to clubs desperate for a talent injection. Extra points value then gets cobbled together for their cheap n discounted academy players who they've already done development work on.
 

year of the tiger

Tiger Legend
Mar 26, 2008
9,510
6,680
Tasmania
There are to many people working at the AFL so they need something to do.

Why can't they leave the draft as it was so it can't be manipulated. When they brought in the extra first round if you didn't win 4 or more games created the tanking problem - now the points system is being manipulated. The AFL create most of their own problems in my view.
 

Willo

Tiger Legend
Oct 13, 2007
18,775
6,697
Aldinga Beach
year of the tiger said:
There are to many people working at the AFL so they need something to do.

Why can't they leave the draft as it was so it can't be manipulated. When they brought in the extra first round if you didn't win 4 or more games created the tanking problem - now the points system is being manipulated. The AFL create most of their own problems in my view.

That's the problem. Too many shiny arses at afl hq. Bring in a rule without too much thought to fix a problem they created in the first place. Then need working parties to fix it. Then make changes, that create another problem to fix. And on it goes. It becomes a sub industry in itself. I wonder how many $millions go down the gurgler. They must base their structure on government departments. Bureaucrats and waste 101.
 

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,908
11,921
willo said:
That's the problem. Too many shiny arses at afl hq. Bring in a rule without too much thought to fix a problem they created in the first place. Then need working parties to fix it. Then make changes, that create another problem to fix. And on it goes. It becomes a sub industry in itself. I wonder how many $millions go down the gurgler. They must base their structure on government departments. Bureaucrats and waste 101.
There was an article, I think in the Hun earlier this year, that commented on the massive growth in shiny armani suits at AFL corporate over the last ten / fifteen years or so and the mega bucks it now costs to run AFL inc. More bloated n bureaucratic than the Govt n our pubic service these days.
 

Dyer'ere

Licensed to kazoo
Sep 21, 2004
19,259
7,417
willo said:
Just a note if you're using the above table.
Pick 31 is 606 points so pick 32 can't be the same.
Pick 32 is actually 584 points

Thanks, willo. :beer
 

Letsroar

Tiger Superstar
May 19, 2014
1,013
335
The system is what it is we need to use it to the maximum.
Trade out some of our mid tier for second and third rounders. Then convert these by dealing with the academy clubs to get first round pick(s).
Don't judge the system understand it and use it