Re: Thoroughbred Horse Racing [Merged]
There can be many theories why Fiorente was such long odds. Another one could be the poor winning history for non-winning horses from the previous year coming back for another crack at it. It's a pretty long bow to suggest it was because of the Waterhouse family and Oliver factor imo. The only place I've heard that mentioned is on here. It would be interesting to know if it's why so few on here tipped/backed Fiorente. My reason is silly at such juicy odds. I just rarely pick favourites. Like you saying Fiorente ticking all the right boxes was reason to be wary. In reality, as hindsight shows, there was very good reason to pick him.
There can be many theories why Fiorente was such long odds. Another one could be the poor winning history for non-winning horses from the previous year coming back for another crack at it. It's a pretty long bow to suggest it was because of the Waterhouse family and Oliver factor imo. The only place I've heard that mentioned is on here. It would be interesting to know if it's why so few on here tipped/backed Fiorente. My reason is silly at such juicy odds. I just rarely pick favourites. Like you saying Fiorente ticking all the right boxes was reason to be wary. In reality, as hindsight shows, there was very good reason to pick him.