We seem to be the only team that doesn't get looked after at home by the umpires.
Crucified all over the country.
Umps probably just know we have a poor list and umpire accordingly.
We seem to be the only team that doesn't get looked after at home by the umpires.
Crucified all over the country.
Or a poor coach. Teams with good coaches like Ken Hinkley seem to get a good ride from the umps.Umps probably just know we have a poor list and umpire accordingly.
Probably because Hardwick does care for his players enough. You have to show you really love them like Buckley.Or a poor coach. Teams with good coaches like Ken Hinkley seem to get a good ride from the umps.
and the RFC got in the head of Fagan and his team ... good ...From what I see, Grimes got into the head of Cameron. Good.
That’s what was heard!It did happen and you’ll find the ump said it was ok because it was a marking contest....
No one was concerned about these tackles?I’ve seen enough.
A shoulder charge is illegal in the NRL.
On at least two occasions we were pinged for holding the ball, when the prior opportunity issue was ignored, but more importantly, there was a flagrant front on launch at the tigers opponent.
Was such a tackle likely or possible to cause injury? Think about it MRO?
Is that tackling part of AFL? Jumping into an opponent!
Jeez, even the doofus in the NRL ban it!
18 -22.Just out of interest by how much did we lose the free kick count yesterday?
You’re looking for an answer?Hey - Can anyone explain Rioli one - where he evades a tackler, bounces the ball then hand passes if off just as a brisbane player gets and ineffective finger nail on his jumper- was he pinged for HTB, incorrect disposal or a throw or something?
As he bounced the ball Zorko did have his hand on him - didn't impede his progress one iota but to the letter of the law he did bounce it whilst being tackled so a free against - technically correct but as per usual no feel for the game from the umpires just like Jack's studs up fiasco last week. Should have been play on imo but there were plenty of worse decisions (like blocking Lynch) etc. etc. Yet Brisbane have the cheek to complain at treatment Cameron got from Grimes!!!!Hey - Can anyone explain Rioli one - where he evades a tackler, bounces the ball then hand passes if off just as a brisbane player gets and ineffective finger nail on his jumper- was he pinged for HTB, incorrect disposal or a throw or something?
I guess it depends on what constitutes a tackle. If that is considered a tackle then I’d expect tackle stats to be higher than they are.As he bounced the ball Zorko did have his hand on him - didn't impede his progress one iota but to the letter of the law he did bounce it whilst being tackled so a free against - technically correct but as per usual no feel for the game from the umpires just like Jack's studs up fiasco last week. Should have been play on imo but there were plenty of worse decisions (like blocking Lynch) etc. etc. Yet Brisbane have the cheek to complain at treatment Cameron got from Grimes!!!!
T44
I was watching that closely at the game. Rioli bounced the ball and while the ball was coming back to him Zorko grabbed him at the maggot called HTB. InsaneHey - Can anyone explain Rioli one - where he evades a tackler, bounces the ball then hand passes if off just as a brisbane player gets and ineffective finger nail on his jumper- was he pinged for HTB, incorrect disposal or a throw or something?
It shat me, but I think it was the right call.I was watching that closely at the game. Rioli bounced the ball and while the ball was coming back to him Zorko grabbed him at the maggot called HTB. Insane
I was watching that closely at the game. Rioli bounced the ball and while the ball was coming back to him Zorko grabbed him at the maggot called HTB. Insane
Heard that on the radio while I was working. Commentators were surprised on the radio and stated he had to be dragged away by officials in Lions outfits.
I hope he cops a fine for that imo.
It’s the KB rule. Bartlett used to throw it out in front of him when he heard footsteps behind him. Would get a holding the man free paid to him all day. They changed the rule eons ago to counteract this. Has been a holding the ball (dropping the ball) free ever since. And rightly so.I was watching that closely at the game. Rioli bounced the ball and while the ball was coming back to him Zorko grabbed him at the maggot called HTB. Insane
I think the ball had returned to Daniel AND THEN was grabbed by the jumper but in the speed of things and it’s appearance the umpire paid the free.That's holding the ball every time then. It doesn't have to come back to you first, the act of bouncing it (which is throwing it to the ground) gives up your right to dispose of it if you are then tackled. If you handballed it for it to come back to you that's a different story.
I think the ball had returned to Daniel AND THEN was grabbed by the jumper but in the speed of things and it’s appearance the umpire paid the free.