-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
The other Preliminary Final
- Thread starter tigerman
- Start date
Came on to make the same comment thinking it might have been buried in an earlier page...but yes 77000 v our exact same time sam opponent 95000. Whole bays empty at their end and gaps everywhere. Think we can say we have gone past them.
Colonwood fans were all out on the town doing burgs n deals while people were distracted, trying to scrape together enough shekels for their Grand Final tickets.
Priceless, TF, just priceless.
I wish I had been able to see footage of McGuire in that last quarter, particularly when the final siren sounded.
There was an article about Grundy saying how family is more important then football.
Reckon he is gone.
So the AFL say the goal was touched, but the ARC still called it correctly........
"The AFL acknowledges that upon review the ball looks to have been touched by GWS Giants player Lachie Keeffe," the statement read.
"In determining a decision, the reviewer must be clearly satisfied that there is sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt to overturn a decision.
"On this occasion, the reviewer at this time was not convinced the ball was touched beyond reasonable doubt to intervene the match and overturn the decision of the umpire.
“This is (in) line with the correct process for a silent review."
This is beyond a joke
"The AFL acknowledges that upon review the ball looks to have been touched by GWS Giants player Lachie Keeffe," the statement read.
"In determining a decision, the reviewer must be clearly satisfied that there is sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt to overturn a decision.
"On this occasion, the reviewer at this time was not convinced the ball was touched beyond reasonable doubt to intervene the match and overturn the decision of the umpire.
“This is (in) line with the correct process for a silent review."
This is beyond a joke
Pity that result in the Prelim, as Collingwood miss the opportunity to extend their lead in the Most Grand Final Losses Stakes!Oh well Scumwood, at least your girls know how to win a flag...
Very, very long time before that becomes an issue.
The leaderboard:
Collingwood: 27
Essendon: 14
Carlton: 13
How long do you think it will take Essendon or Carlton to even reach enough Grand Finals, let alone lose them all.
Amazing to think Collingwood have as many as the next two combined.
Seems a few magpie ferals are relieved they didn't survive the preliminary final.
Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board :: View topic - Confess, did YOU REALLY want to face Tigers in GF ??
Collingwood Football Club supporters' forum featuring the Magpies, the great Australian Rules football team
www.magpies.net
I did say “extend their lead”!
Collingwood have absolute supremacy at Choking, they know no peer.
