Yep, the climate is certainly changing.Melbourne is about to complete a cold April, on the back of its cold March and cold February.
April avg: 19.5 (-1.6 on 30-year average)
March avg: 22.9 (-1.7)
February avg 24.4 (-2.5)
Yep, the climate is certainly changing.Melbourne is about to complete a cold April, on the back of its cold March and cold February.
April avg: 19.5 (-1.6 on 30-year average)
March avg: 22.9 (-1.7)
February avg 24.4 (-2.5)
Please tell me the threat of COVID-19 isn't being equated to the threat of climate change...?!
Melbourne is about to complete a cold April, on the back of its cold March and cold February.
April avg: 19.5 (-1.6 on 30-year average)
March avg: 22.9 (-1.7)
February avg 24.4 (-2.5)
There is a fair amount of crap in the film most definitely.
the RW/CC deniers have always blindly followed Michael Moore.It gets it's data on energy taken to produce renewable tech in terms of energy produced in terms of whole of product lifespan horribly wrong. No surprise, since it wants to make the point below.
Where it gets some stuff right (I've read, haven't watched it yet) is in terms of the fundamental incompatibility of an economic system predicated on theoretical unlimited natural resources and permanent growth, and a damaged/dead ecosystem. That's unsustainable.
It is amusing to see the RW/CC deniers champion this film since it basically calls for the abolition of capitalism/industrial society.
It does a good job of pointing out green energy is not really doing anything to help CC, and does a good job of taking down some snake oil salesman like Al Gore. It’s malthusian overpopulation argument has been debunked years ago as has it’s anti-capitalist message.It gets it's data on energy taken to produce renewable tech in terms of energy produced in terms of whole of product lifespan horribly wrong. No surprise, since it wants to make the point below.
Where it gets some stuff right (I've read, haven't watched it yet) is in terms of the fundamental incompatibility of an economic system predicated on theoretical unlimited natural resources and permanent growth, and a damaged/dead ecosystem. That's unsustainable.
It is amusing to see the RW/CC deniers champion this film since it basically calls for the abolition of capitalism/industrial society.
the RW/CC deniers have always blindly followed Michael Moore.
You haven’t even seen it!Heh... yeah TBH I find the whole thing bizarre. Why Moore would get behind this shyte is beyond me.
You haven’t even seen it!
I don't have to watch Married At First Sight to know that it's shyte either.
There is a fair amount of crap in the film most definitely.
You'll probably disagree with what I considered crap.I took your own assessment to be accurate. Was that wrong?
A nice self-portrait of DS? It might be accurate but nice isn't the word I'd use.Nice self portrait.
DS
You'll probably disagree with what I considered crap.
Im guessing all the arguments against clean energy were accurate, and all the arguments against capitalism were false. Simple really.Specify precisely all the arguments in the film that you think were accurate. We can then have hours of fun debunking them.
Onus is on you to debunk if you want to. Feel free.Specify precisely all the arguments in the film that you think were accurate. We can then have hours of fun debunking them.
Hehe clean energy.Im guessing all the arguments against clean energy were accurate, and all the arguments against capitalism were false. Simple really.
Onus is on you to debunk if you want to. Feel free.
- It looks at the fossil fuel usage required to create "clean" energy producing assetsYou said "it doesn't paint a rosy picture" but can't give us a single example of what that means.
If I was a cynic I'd be tempted to think you haven't watched the film yourself.