-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Goodbye Mabior Chol
- Thread starter Rancey18
- Start date
56% game time and looked out on his feet in the 3rd and 4th. Best game by far but not sure you can carry a player in that position without a tank to play a whole game
Was he shopping himself?
In spite of a great performance I'm not convinced he'll be at Richmond next season.
In spite of a great performance I'm not convinced he'll be at Richmond next season.
*smile* hell Marbs , why oh why do you do this to us who have put a line through you , say it again , he is the greatest tease i remember , wrapt he played well, however just can’t trust his lack of efffort he produces in long periods of games
I saw an article suggesting Norf are preparing a ‘big money’ offer for Chol… And we’ll get nothing for a player we’ve been developing for 7 years. Ridiculous rule.
Probably his best game, but he has to set a benchmark and keep hitting it. It’s no coincidence that this happened when Nank returned, too.
Hopefully 'big money' means a commensurate compensation pick. Oh wait it's an arbitrary AFL formula and we'll be screwed like we were for Ellis. Carry on.
Cholly's unrestricted. He can go wherever he wants to, at this stage of his career I doubt very much that there'd be a massive offer for him or much if any compo. I'd rather keep him as I reckon he's still got another year or so developing before he finds a level of match consistency. His good footy can be fairly *smile* awesome, he just needs to balance his game input.
Yep, he has the tools . . . but the question is whether he knows how to use them.
Still fades in and out too much and can't handle high percentage of game on the ground. Not sure how we fix that, is it possible? If he could build more tank and play a bit more game time he can certainly be a very good player. Plus, if he plays well he is damned hard to match up on, especially if he is not the first ruck or forward, rather the second ruck and maybe 3rd forward. Gives the opposition a really tough problem to nullify him.
Plus, if he is playing forward he doesn't need much of a game to influence. 56% time on ground, a fair bit of that in the ruck, and he kicks 4 goals - that's 4 goals the opposition have to match or better.
DS
Still fades in and out too much and can't handle high percentage of game on the ground. Not sure how we fix that, is it possible? If he could build more tank and play a bit more game time he can certainly be a very good player. Plus, if he plays well he is damned hard to match up on, especially if he is not the first ruck or forward, rather the second ruck and maybe 3rd forward. Gives the opposition a really tough problem to nullify him.
Plus, if he is playing forward he doesn't need much of a game to influence. 56% time on ground, a fair bit of that in the ruck, and he kicks 4 goals - that's 4 goals the opposition have to match or better.
DS
<
Fraser Turner
|
Bring on 2024
>
