-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Coronavirus
- Thread starter Tigers of Old
- Start date
I dunno, it's "private info" from a "military source" and it's on social media, so must be legit
Can see why people believe it...?
The bit that these "plandemic" followers seem to miss is IF what they say is true, we truly have some of the most incompetent fools in charge the world has ever seen.
The logic behind world governments getting together to reduce population size to attack things like climate change / dominance of China etc actually has merit. For governments to have at their disposal some of the worst of the worst diseases going around (and they have scientists that can manipulate those viruses to make them even more deadly), and then "only" kill around a net increase of 1-2m is astoundingly incompetent. Whilst I think we all believe that most governments are incompetent, surely even they couldn't screw something like releasing a disease up as badly as they would have if this was actually what was occurring.
If this was planned, I would have expected a minimum of 5-10% of the worlds population to have perished so you are looking at 350m-700m yet we are standing at 5m (gross, net after the reductions in flu etc it would be much lower) then that would equate to one of the worst rolled up programmes you'd ever see.
That doesn't sound workable. If an unvaccinated person turns up for the start of the game and sits down for a drink afterward, who's going to tell them to leave the building?
The thought has occurred to me that the virus may have been released with that aim and the connivance of the UN in order to reduce pressure on China to act on climate change. If somebody emerged with some evidence, I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand.
Why bother with 5-10%? That only buys 5-10 years and we are back where we started. Better to get rid of 50-60% of the population to make it really worthwhile.
I agree, astonishing incompetence to only kill a few million
They should allow boosters after 5 months going by the Israel study, there is plenty of Pfizer to process people who want it asap.
www.theage.com.au
Pfizer booster jab reduces risk of COVID hospital stint by 93 per cent
A study of 1.5 million Israelis just published in the Lancet shows rates of COVID hospitalisation and death shrinking drastically after five-month booster.
I wouldn't know these tools exist and their message if it wasn't for PRE. (Is ignorance bliss?)
Agree that there are issues...
but last year we had to clear the stadium before the next match entered.
Was talking to a bloke who is in a pistol club... they have the same issue ... the shooting part is a sport = no vax required... their premises are licensed = vax required. He also said that as club they can imposes any conditions of entry they wish eg As in vax required (gave the example that No camouflage clothing is allowed!) Not sure how far a volunteer organisations can go in setting such rules though.
It’s interesting, 22. My wife plays softball, non contact sport, they have to be fully vaxxed before they’re allowed to play. I score for the team, and I have to be fully vaxxed to do that.
And?
Here is the finding.
“Findings
At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1)”
That is a meaningless finding. It’s a click bait headline that distorts the finding by omitting the 7 days. Who cares if vaccine rates and case rates don’t correlate for week 90 odd of the pandemic.
FMD.
