The last time I looked racial abuse is against the law? Currently there is no law against non vaccination.would you defend "tooth and nail" a persons right to yell racist abuse at the footy? or does "free speech" only go so far?
should you be fighting that law? or would be ok if the government made a law that said to vocally oppose vaccinations was a crime?The last time I looked racial abuse is against the law? Currently there is no law against non vaccination.
I mean I don’t know how even vaccinated people can see their grandmothers, don’t they know they could reduce the risk even more by not even visiting their grandmother?so she is 100% protected? so if everyone was vaccinated Covid would cease?
or does getting vaccinated reduce the chance of transmission? So if both she and Jones were vaccinated the chance he could give it to her would be reduced?
You are now playing with semantics Bro17. Throw one back to you now. If you wanted all persons to be vaccinated because of the belief that it will save lives fine.But will you (assuming you partake) stop smoking,stop driving a car,stop drinking,stop having sex because of the same belief?Where do you draw the line?should you be fighting that law? or would be ok if the government made a law that said to vocally oppose vaccinations was a crime?
Yet you took offence when I aired my views on Jones' action?But I will fight tooth and nail for that person's right to air his views
Seem to recall that Rance was not of Mormon faith but rather a Jehovah's Witness.I wonder if we would have lost Rance. Don't know the Mormons position on this. Maybe he won't be able to work for the dons after all.
Only questioned the manner.Yet you took offence when I aired my views on Jones' action?
Cheers. Still wonder what that means.Seem to recall that Rance was not of Mormon faith but rather a Jehovah's Witness.
No one has taken that away have they?If you wind back to where I made my post Jazzy,you would see it relates to question asked around we live in a democratic society giving us the freedoms such as choice and speechWhether I agree,or disagree with someone's ideals etc is immaterial.But I will fight tooth and nail for that person's right to air his views.Anything else becomes zealotry and one thing for sure we have plenty of that in human history.
I stopped having sex when I got married.You are now playing with semantics Bro17. Throw one back to you now. If you wanted all persons to be vaccinated because of the belief that it will save lives fine.But will you (assuming you partake) stop smoking,stop driving a car,stop drinking,stop having sex because of the same belief?Where do you draw the line?
No semantics. You oppose restrictions on free speech unless it is against the law. Shouldn't you oppose laws which restrict free speech? Or do you pick and choose when free speech is worth fighting for?You are now playing with semantics Bro17. Throw one back to you now. If you wanted all persons to be vaccinated because of the belief that it will save lives fine.But will you (assuming you partake) stop smoking,stop driving a car,stop drinking,stop having sex because of the same belief?Where do you draw the line?
They could, but that would negativelyI mean I don’t know how even vaccinated people can see their grandmothers, don’t they know they could reduce the risk even more by not even visiting their grandmother?
we will find out, cos he wont be able to continue coaching at Essendon if he isnt vaccinated.Cheers. Still wonder what that means.
Jehovah's Witnesses revised their stance against vaccination in 1952:we will find out, cos he wont be able to continue coaching at Essendon if he isnt vaccinated.
Well it’s not like they are allowed to tell him anything else. There is the approved line from up above that is the only line a doctor can follow, they have no freedom to recommend otherwise.I'm staggered by this. Absolutely staggered.
Perhaps no better encapsulation of the times we live in when a professional sportsman whose educational qualifications are completing year 12 while on an AFL list and whose medical qualifications are zero, dismisses the advice of multiple medical experts with vast amounts of qualifications, experience and knowledge.