I don’t understand why their attack isn’t ‘he handed in a false declaration on his documents’ it’s provable, it’s a deportable offence and he’s admitted it. This anti vax thing isn’t any of those and is going to be something his lawyers can defend against.Why is the government getting dragged into anti vaccine sentiment, protests etc ? Has nothing to do with it.
Just stick to the point of law - the immigration minister’s rights and the fact that he didn’t meet the exemption criteria and he supplied incorrect information on his application both of which support the minister’s rights and his decision. And then highlight the perils of not upholding that capability for Australia should they allow him to stay.
The government appear to be blowing this by going down a vague, irrelevant and easily countered path.