Cause they have elite ball users right across the park and have an elite forward line and backline
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Round 4: the root canal games.
- Thread starter Redford
- Start date
Cause they have elite ball users right across the park and have an elite forward line and backline
Surely the Bumwood v Borethorn game could have been pushed back a bit by the AFL and we played at Adelaide Oval as part of a double header - like they did yesterday ?
Oh that’s right. We have to **** Richmond over.
Forgot about that.
Oh that’s right. We have to **** Richmond over.
Forgot about that.
Too late …. Surprised he didn’t suggest we need more field umpires
What about standing down the umps that then gave a free in front of goal for dissent
He said it all in a brazen way like it didn't affect a team winning. Umpteen times we hear the 'umpires were wrong' when it is all too late as if it doesn't matter. As bad as any weak apology nowadays.
What a fraud.
Problem is it did affect the result instead of a ball up the mistake resulted in 2 goals and a Cartoon win
Exactly right. Dissent wouldn't be there if these dumb sh!t flogs did it properly.
How's the Cartoon supporters proud of themselves calling Freo and others salty. Admit it d-heads.
Problem is that if the maggots hadn't totally *smile* up by paying a mark to the Carlscum bloke off an obviously touched ball. Then there'd be no dissent to contend with in the first place.
It's nothing more than pathetic arse covering to rule the dissent free as a correct decision and thereby allocating Carlscum an extra goal plus another few seconds of time wastage. When the previous decision that allowed Carlscum the first shot at goal to hit the lead was so blatantly wrong.
I went against my better judgement & watched some of a couple of games in the last few days.
One thing I noticed was how many players were showing dissent & NOT ONE of them were penalised, NOT ONE, how then can the AFL justify that particular call.
How in hell can players know where they stand in regards to that "rule" when one umpire can take offence at something that another umpire lets go.
Absolute stupidity from an organisation that is expert in stupidity, mismanagement, inconsistency & sheer dumbness.
No wonder so many people are becoming pee'd off with our once fantastic game.
One thing I noticed was how many players were showing dissent & NOT ONE of them were penalised, NOT ONE, how then can the AFL justify that particular call.
How in hell can players know where they stand in regards to that "rule" when one umpire can take offence at something that another umpire lets go.
Absolute stupidity from an organisation that is expert in stupidity, mismanagement, inconsistency & sheer dumbness.
No wonder so many people are becoming pee'd off with our once fantastic game.
