GoodOne said:
And then complain about our lack of talls. Hard to win. This guy has talent, has shown he can kick bags of goals. There is no way he would have dropped to anywhere near 35. Major risk is his shoulder but the upside is massive.
your opinion is he would not have lasted to pick 35 mine is he may have. i had two others in front of him and they lasted to picks 24 and 25. was quite happy to take a couple of b grade talls at 35 and 44 not at 19. did we take any other talls other than astbury and griffiths.
just my opinion but i would have taken carlisle or black in front of him if we were to use a pick on a tall at 19. ive said for awhile now if bastinac was there at 19 we should take him.
rhis is not a go at any one or griffiths i hope he can be the next richo or plugger im just voicing my opinion very early that imo it would have been better to take carlisle or black at 19 if we were to take a tall there. why because i rate them a little higher than griffiths nothing else in it.
we dont all clap our hands with glee just because the club has drafted someone. with bastinac bartlett and stevens i reckon you could say you are pretty confident of them being good footballers griffiths well lets hope thay have it right and have the same confidence.they better, pick 19 is not to be trifled with. for now i will trust they know what they are doing and have made a good choice and i will reiterate again im just voicing an opinion probably when i shouldnt i have not seen much of the kids at all this yr.
oh and good luck ben heres hoping you have a long and illustrious career at richmond. you have obvious talent and i apologise before hand for rating a couple of talls in front of you .
shouldnt say it here but sheesh we should have tanked picks 18 and 20 we could have had the best of both worlds.