Wrong .
The Gold Coast is sub tropics not tropics
Mere technicality.
DS
Wrong .
The Gold Coast is sub tropics not tropics
But to me for some reason the one I can’t let go of is the 2022 final against Brisbane where we were robbed of a finals win by sheer incompetence. Was that the AFL’s fault , probably not, but they should have admitted the error or at least been transparent. Still makes my blood boil
Wrong .
The Gold Coast is sub tropics not tropics
True. Recently lived in sydney and it was mad tropical. No summers just wet season.Global Warming would like a word...
It would be unwise to publicly (or even privately) take on AFLHQ until we are financially independent and based on last year’s finances that’s a while off yet.
Play the long game. Stay quiet and focus on building the empire. We need to be able to operate without the entire AFL dividend which is currently around 12-13m for us. Once we can do that, the AFL lose much of their leverage against us.
It would be unwise to publicly (or even privately) take on AFLHQ until we are financially independent and based on last year’s finances that’s a while off yet.
Play the long game. Stay quiet and focus on building the empire. We need to be able to operate without the entire AFL dividend which is currently around 12-13m for us. Once we can do that, the AFL lose much of their leverage against us.
Before that the first thing I would like to see is do is get rid of the pokies if our finances improvedIt would be unwise to publicly (or even privately) take on AFLHQ until we are financially independent and based on last year’s finances that’s a while off yet.
Play the long game. Stay quiet and focus on building the empire. We need to be able to operate without the entire AFL dividend which is currently around 12-13m for us. Once we can do that, the AFL lose much of their leverage against us.
Not really as the AFL owns the copyright to all the clubs' identities. No way to be independent.
In any case, we balance the books and they will just fleece us even more. Seen that too often in large organisations, the section which balances the books doesn't get more money, they just get to subsidise other sections more.
I suppose we can just accept the current treatment, keep lobbying behind closed doors and continue to get shafted.
DS
I think you misunderstood me.Not really as the AFL owns the copyright to all the clubs' identities. No way to be independent.
In any case, we balance the books and they will just fleece us even more. Seen that too often in large organisations, the section which balances the books doesn't get more money, they just get to subsidise other sections more.
I suppose we can just accept the current treatment, keep lobbying behind closed doors and continue to get shafted.
DS
I think you misunderstood me.
As long as we are financially dependent on the annual dividend, we are vulnerable to retaliation from HQ if we speak out of turn. If we can generate enough revenue from non-football operations to entirely fund our football department we remove the biggest leverage HQ has over us.
Remember, even AFL HQ answers to someone and there is only so far they can screw us on the draw, Sunday afternoon games etc. Their TV overlords want ratings and successful Richmond side brings in ratings.
We currently gross about 28 million more than Geelong does,but this must be getting used not well in terms of footy on the field as we don't appear to.have a advantage over them.It would be unwise to publicly (or even privately) take on AFLHQ until we are financially independent and based on last year’s finances that’s a while off yet.
Play the long game. Stay quiet and focus on building the empire. We need to be able to operate without the entire AFL dividend which is currently around 12-13m for us. Once we can do that, the AFL lose much of their leverage against us.
I think you misunderstood me.
As long as we are financially dependent on the annual dividend, we are vulnerable to retaliation from HQ if we speak out of turn. If we can generate enough revenue from non-football operations to entirely fund our football department we remove the biggest leverage HQ has over us.
Remember, even AFL HQ answers to someone and there is only so far they can screw us on the draw, Sunday afternoon games etc. Their TV overlords want ratings and successful Richmond side brings in ratings.
We currently gross about 28 million more than Geelong does,but this must be getting used not well in terms of footy on the field as we don't appear to.have a advantage over them.
I believe we must place 5 million of the extra turnover we get over geelong into recruiting players,find 20 to 30 more Intel recruiters and get a advantage that lower grossing clubs can't match find the hidden gems more than other clubs,it just needs more information from. Local league's to us.We can't spend anymore money on our footy department due to the AFL imposed "soft salary cap". If we do we're penalised 100% by them. Remember that soft cap was savagely reduced during Covid & has only been partially restored. All clubs had to jettison a lot of personnel at that time. Strangely the AFL only reduced it's overheads by some 20% at that time. I'm not sure by how much the "executives" reduced their salary at that time, because they never disclose what they're being paid.
Keep a weather eye on the Bougainvilleas. Only the purple variety are seen south of the tropics. If you start to see the others colours flourishing you're not in the sub-tropics anymore.True. Recently lived in sydney and it was mad tropical. No summers just wet season.
But every club in the entire comp gets a financial dividend from AFLHQ regardless of whether they make a profit or not. It's their share of being a part of the competition.As long as we are financially dependent on the annual dividend, we are vulnerable to retaliation from HQ if we speak out of turn. If we can generate enough revenue from non-football operations to entirely fund our football department we remove the biggest leverage HQ has over us.
I think you misunderstood me.
As long as we are financially dependent on the annual dividend, we are vulnerable to retaliation from HQ if we speak out of turn. If we can generate enough revenue from non-football operations to entirely fund our football department we remove the biggest leverage HQ has over us.
Remember, even AFL HQ answers to someone and there is only so far they can screw us on the draw, Sunday afternoon games etc. Their TV overlords want ratings and successful Richmond side brings in ratings.
There are some blokes that do get umpired differently.What is it with all this conspiracy talk. We give away far too many free kicks because of poor technique. We still won 3 grand finals in 4 years in spite of losing the free kick counts. As if the club don't have regular meetings with the umpires to go through things. They would have had umpires down to talk about what we are doing wrong. We play with Richmond edge.
As if all the umpires conspire against us!!! FFS.