Serious question here - I don't know the answer.
Hocking cops alot of flak here - perhaps rightly so. But does (did) he have carte blanche to do what he likes? Surely not. Probably he can bring up suggestions and have his say, but I would think to bring in a rule change would require some sort of consensus. Does anyone know what the protocol is for implementing changes?
Two bodies.
Hocking's Game Analysis Committee (Hocking, Josh Vanderloo, Damian Farrow, Sam Robertson, Karl Jackson, Marcus Wagner, David Rath, Binuk Kodituwakku, David Noble as of April this year)
Competition Committee (changeable group of about 20 - has included Hocking, Malcolm Blight, Colin Carter, Andrew Ireland, Jason Ball, Simon Garlick, Dangerfield, Nicole Livingstone, Laura Kane... Peggy O'Neal etc etc)
Blight got all the headlines when the latter group was formed to come up with ideas for rule changes, but it's a toothless tiger.
It was informed by Hocking on the morning of the AFL announcement that the AFL had already approved rule changes they had not properly considered, including the stand rule.
Blight made a big noise about the wacko ideas he had and told people in the industry to resign if they didn't like it. He still has an active thread dedicated to him on this forum. But in the end he was just a patsy.
The Game Analysis Committee had all the power and is responsible for inflicting the shithousery. Their rule changes obviously had to be approved by the AFL Commission, but they did so without trial... and without due consideration by the body ostensibly formed to oversee them.
Yes, Hocking is as guilty as sin.