The game was NOT over until Prestia had taken his kick. Therefore Swans player interferes by kicking the ball away. That is all that had to be considered. Technically, 50 metres. Umpire was right. Goon on the mike was wrong!!!!
we are trail blazers.
first ever player penalised for a rushed behind: Luke McGuane
first player ever penalised for marking a ball in a game with a huge crowd when the touched off the boot call couldn;t be heard: Bachar Houli (and hasn't happened since)
first ever player penalised for appealing for a free kick that wasn't paid: Tom Lynch
The first ever 50 against a player for not getting back nine metres from the mark to the opposition on the goal line, against Dusty Happens a few times a game, every game, free or a mark at fullback, player on the mark forgets or pretends to forget to get back 9 metres, ump reminds him, he dawdles back 9 metres. Thats the way it goes and has always gone, until last night. Dusty actually moved quicker than most.
Yep between the free, and after Dion had kicked it and the ball was deemed dead, the game was alive. 50 everyday.The game was NOT over until Prestia had taken his kick. Therefore Swans player interferes by kicking the ball away. That is all that had to be considered. Technically, 50 metres. Umpire was right. Goon on the mike was wrong!!!!
Yes a lot of cotchin haters.Harry have a read of the comments about the incident.
80% are 'he shouldve hit him harder'
'Thanks bud' 'Got what he deserved'
'Every dog has his day" 'the slippery gets snipped'
The hate towards Cotchin is unbelievable.
I never realised that Cotchin was hated to that level.
Cotchins hit on Sheild will be his stamp on the game to many outside Richmond.
And Gaff was going for the chest and missed, breaking Brayshaws jaw and knocking out teeth.so Buddy was going for the chest the first one and got him in the throat? And he was going for the throat the second one and got him in the jaw? Pretty uncoordinated from one of the most well coordinated athletes in history.
Buddy goes the knuckle when the game is hot and they are getting beaten. Becomes uncharacteristically clumsy. Has done for a good 6 seasons.
Just ignorant, jealous ferals.Yes a lot of cotchin haters.
Total dickheads.
Says someone who has 5 million followersI'm not sure Twitter is the best way for our coach to voice his concerns tbh.
He’s a …..Mince defending the non 50m on SEN. Surprise surprise.
Yep. Being 5 goals up was our protection against he umpiring and we blew it. What is it they say in boxing about leaving it in the judges hands?Forget the crap umpiring.
We blew it pure and simple. Poor discipline, dropping intensity in 3rd qtr, no urgency to respond to Longmire’s positional moves at half time.
Yeah it should have been fifty. But we were quite frankly stupid enough to put ourselves in that situation in the first place.
The inconsistency from one week to the next is utterly crazy, it lends to the notion that the AFL has preferred outcomes.yeah, common sense can never be used as justification for anything because it can't be measured. Our common sense is very different to Hockings.
This sums up why, its elastic, you can use it selectively anytime you want, and it gets compounded, not reduced, by these ham fisted rushed-in rules.
A player backing away from the mark gets 50 paid against? That is the opposite of common sense. It defies the logic and spirit of the game, the line of scrimmage that exists in every football code. The player on the mark is giving the player with the ball more ground, but a 50 against? Defies common sense.
Arms-out being 50 metres regardless of if it has zero aggression and is just confusion, which most are, or if its genuine aggression and dissent. This rule wasn't needed, created problems where there were none. Umps have always been able to pay a 50 or a free for dissent, arms-out or not. Why put the blanket arms-out rule in? Just pay a free or 50 if there is genuine dissent. Defies common sense.
The AFL routinely do the opposite of common sense, then they use common sense as a defence when it suits. Corrupt hillbillies.
Especially this year when they have been paying them for very small indiscretions.The inconsistency from one week to the next is utterly crazy, it lends to the notion that the AFL has preferred outcomes.
Last week Dusty and Shai were both penalised 50 meters when it was absolutely clear that they never heard the whistle.
No one spoke of using common sense then, the rule was black and white and we got penalised. Less than 7 days later the rule isn’t black and white and the umpires are able to apply their own interpretation.
People power usually win in the end.
Forget the crap umpiring.
We blew it pure and simple.