poppa x said:I'm not going to bite!
Brodders17 said:i'll guess then you mean "craig thompson" representsallsome unions bosses/officials to be'evil'corrupt. correct?
poppa x said:Edited.
Brodders17 said:fair enough. so Craig Thompson represents some union officials being corrupt, like person x represents some politicians/police/CEOs/doctors/banker/insert any type of worker being corrupt. im not sure what you '2 words' actually add to the debate.
Ian4 said:i'm happy for abbott to have a royal commision into union corruption as long as there is also a royal commision into big business corruption. afterall, whats good for the geese is good for the gander. unions are far from perfect, but they're no less corrupt than big business.
#NotHoldingMyBreath
P.S. if this isn't the start of workchoices by stealth, i'll go he.
KnightersRevenge said:Fair enough but I'm confused...we can't afford a carbon price and we can't afford education reform but we can afford a royal commission into unions?
Brodders17 said:and a royal commission into the home insulation scheme.
Baloo said:Do they have a Royale with Cheese Commission ?