Wouldn't triangulation in this case just mean three different camera shots at the same point in time?
My take on last night was the AFL were adamant to Hardwick they made the right call based on the technical aspects and Hardwick is still dubious but doesn't have the knowledge base to question what they are saying.
Would be interesting to hear from experts on it.
Maybe. Agree Dimma still sus. All we can do is speculate.
Still a lot of outstanding issues.
1) Its still not clear if triangulation is effective at all, let alone in this case. It sounds good, but bending and spinning balls and endless possible angles, I'm not convinced. I don't know who did that diagram, but that is a joke.
2) Did they triangulate on the night or after the fact? If it was at the time, it must have been from the footage we saw, in which case forget it, they couldn't tell from the various angles we saw and we're back to square 1, if it was the second, that still leaves us with the fact they didn't follow the process correctly at the time.
3) The fact they still won't show us any evidence at all suggests it was a stuff up, they don't want to open up any can of pandoras by admitting it, and they can crank up the PR machine to muddy the waters with 'secret footage', 'right call wrong process' BS knowing all non-tiger fans are happy whatever way we lose, and can call us whingers.