Like almost all of Matt Guys promisesOnly in Victoria we have so many large blow outs,and l think there are future projects that have been announced that haven't even been properly costed yet
ya cooker?
Like almost all of Matt Guys promisesOnly in Victoria we have so many large blow outs,and l think there are future projects that have been announced that haven't even been properly costed yet
Guy is getting rid of the rail loop for now ,so there''s 35billion to build in the health sector right across Victoria ,this is what people need ,not some city centric rail loop.Like almost all of Matt Guys promises
ya cooker?
You've falsely called Andrews a criminal, a dictator, a communist and im sure there are others, but you think we should have a discussion without insults?Mate if you can't have a discussion without the insult,it shows what sort of person you are
You seem well versed on Credlin and Bolt
Mate if you can't have a discussion without the insult,it shows what sort of person you areThe only cookers around here are labor supporters .
People are still catching it and dying from itThe difference is people can protect themselves with vaccines.
When someone has to be vaccinated to go to work,were''s the democratic rights ,when police go to a persons house and get arrested because they are trying to ORGANIZE a anti lock down protest ,organize mind you,it didn't eventuate,yet they had a blm protest which was ok.Yeah, when I'm bored and feel like a chuckle I check out what they've been saying then play Pick the Sky Viewer on the socials. pretty easy really. So easy it can now be done without needing to lookup what Bolt, Credlin etc are saying.
Anyway, so you are now admitting Dan has not been convicted, or even charged, with any crime? That would mean he's not a criminal? Or is there some other definition you use to label someone a criminal?
What was disgraceful was the lies and lack of accountability in regards to the hotel quarantine private security decision. An obvious question for Guy last night would have been, a $30Million decision was made by his government (anyone with an IQ above 10 knows it was him personally) that caused the deaths of 801 Victorians, within weeks neither Andrews nor anyone in government could advise who made that $30Million fatal decision. So were you and your fellow minsters lying under oath or are you just totally and utterly incompetent?The excessive lock downs was criminal,the first 6-12 months ,yeah ok but after that there was no need .
Whats the difference now to the 2 years of lock downs,covid is still here.
Im sure Andrews doesn't like mentioning all the class actions against the state,which could cost them Billions of Tax payers money again.
Dan Andrews time is running out ,ibacc will get him,or another whistleblower will come out of the wood work
The crime is against peoples rights ,and lets see what becomes of the ibacc investigations ,lm sure theirs going to be moreBut what is the crime? What has been charged or convicted with? What did he do that was against the law?
You and your skyhun buddies may not like what he did, but it wasn't criminal no matter how many times it's repeated.
The crime is against peoples rights ,and lets see what becomes of the ibacc investigations ,lm sure theirs going to be more
its the vibe.What is the law that was broken to make it a cime?
Sad but true.Everyone hates Andrews including his own party and he'll still win.
You have me mixed up with Dan Andrews ,he's the one wetting the bed.
So it's OK to insult people not on the forums? Give it a rest Bengal, the hypocrisy is humongous.Mate if you can't have a discussion without the insult,it shows what sort of person you are
Yes, because this is a totally impartial question to ask in a debate.What was disgraceful was the lies and lack of accountability in regards to the hotel quarantine private security decision. An obvious question for Guy last night would have been, a $30Million decision was made by his government (anyone with an IQ above 10 knows it was him personally) that caused the deaths of 801 Victorians, within weeks neither Andrews nor anyone in government could advise who made that $30Million fatal decision. So were you and your fellow minsters lying under oath or are you just totally and utterly incompetent?
They were given a question each at the end to ask each other. If you read what I wrote, you will see it says for Guy not the moderator, so don't need your dribbling rant.Yes, because this is a totally impartial question to ask in a debate.
You guys (Anti-Dan people) are frothing at the mouth with vitriol, but can't see the double standard in your approach. If things were handled the same was as what you're suggesting, for the Lib/Nats - you'd be crying how unfair it is. Look at Kennett, with a Debate being jointly hosted by the Herald-Sun and Sky news, he said it was unfairly moderated in favour of Andrews. It couldn't have been set up to be any more pro-Liberal, and yet they're still claiming Andrews somehow had a favourable outcome. It's madness.
The second both sides can step back in and have some RATIONAL DEBATE rather than resort to name calling, arguments with no basis in fact, hyperbole, the sooner we can get a decent political system again. The brainless approach of parroting back what the "Thought leaders" in mainstream media and social media want you to do is belittling to yourselves, and everyone else discussing the topic. Fed up with this childish approach to politics, it achieves nothing.
If there's any dribbling in this thread, that bulk of it is coming from yourself and Bengal.They were given a question each at the end to ask each other. If you read what I wrote, you will see it says for Guy not the moderator, so don't need your dribbling rant.