Vic State Election 22 | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Vic State Election 22

bengal tigers

Tiger Superstar
Apr 29, 2015
1,310
1,332
Like almost all of Matt Guys promises
ya cooker?
Guy is getting rid of the rail loop for now ,so there''s 35billion to build in the health sector right across Victoria ,this is what people need ,not some city centric rail loop.
Labors rail loop 35billion which is expected to balloon out to 125 billion,plus all the other things he has promised pre election.
The only cookers around here are labor supporters .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Brodders17

Tiger Legend
Mar 21, 2008
17,812
12,003
Mate if you can't have a discussion without the insult,it shows what sort of person you are
You've falsely called Andrews a criminal, a dictator, a communist and im sure there are others, but you think we should have a discussion without insults?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Baloo

Delisted Free Agent
Nov 8, 2005
44,172
19,044
You seem well versed on Credlin and Bolt

Yeah, when I'm bored and feel like a chuckle I check out what they've been saying then play Pick the Sky Viewer on the socials. pretty easy really. So easy it can now be done without needing to lookup what Bolt, Credlin etc are saying.

Anyway, so you are now admitting Dan has not been convicted, or even charged, with any crime? That would mean he's not a criminal? Or is there some other definition you use to label someone a criminal?
 

bengal tigers

Tiger Superstar
Apr 29, 2015
1,310
1,332
The difference is people can protect themselves with vaccines.
People are still catching it and dying from it
Yeah, when I'm bored and feel like a chuckle I check out what they've been saying then play Pick the Sky Viewer on the socials. pretty easy really. So easy it can now be done without needing to lookup what Bolt, Credlin etc are saying.

Anyway, so you are now admitting Dan has not been convicted, or even charged, with any crime? That would mean he's not a criminal? Or is there some other definition you use to label someone a criminal?
When someone has to be vaccinated to go to work,were''s the democratic rights ,when police go to a persons house and get arrested because they are trying to ORGANIZE a anti lock down protest ,organize mind you,it didn't eventuate,yet they had a blm protest which was ok.
 

Baloo

Delisted Free Agent
Nov 8, 2005
44,172
19,044
But what is the crime? What has been charged or convicted with? What did he do that was against the law?

You and your skyhun buddies may not like what he did, but it wasn't criminal no matter how many times it's repeated.
 

TigerForce

Tiger Legend
Apr 26, 2004
71,264
22,182
57
A lot of Labour voters did a turncoat on Andrews after they became sick of the lockdowns and said they'd vote him out. Let's see how many backflippers there will be on Saturday night.

Liberals just don't have enough strong and convincing leaders since the Jeffrey era.
 

Big Tiger

Tiger Rookie
Jul 15, 2013
242
148
The excessive lock downs was criminal,the first 6-12 months ,yeah ok but after that there was no need .
Whats the difference now to the 2 years of lock downs,covid is still here.
Im sure Andrews doesn't like mentioning all the class actions against the state,which could cost them Billions of Tax payers money again.
Dan Andrews time is running out ,ibacc will get him,or another whistleblower will come out of the wood work
What was disgraceful was the lies and lack of accountability in regards to the hotel quarantine private security decision. An obvious question for Guy last night would have been, a $30Million decision was made by his government (anyone with an IQ above 10 knows it was him personally) that caused the deaths of 801 Victorians, within weeks neither Andrews nor anyone in government could advise who made that $30Million fatal decision. So were you and your fellow minsters lying under oath or are you just totally and utterly incompetent?
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: 3 users

bengal tigers

Tiger Superstar
Apr 29, 2015
1,310
1,332
But what is the crime? What has been charged or convicted with? What did he do that was against the law?

You and your skyhun buddies may not like what he did, but it wasn't criminal no matter how many times it's repeated.
The crime is against peoples rights ,and lets see what becomes of the ibacc investigations ,lm sure theirs going to be more
 

Baloo

Delisted Free Agent
Nov 8, 2005
44,172
19,044
its the vibe.
Vibes Vibing GIF by Married At First Sight
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user

The_General

It's been a very hard working from home
Staff member
May 4, 2004
11,047
7,328
What was disgraceful was the lies and lack of accountability in regards to the hotel quarantine private security decision. An obvious question for Guy last night would have been, a $30Million decision was made by his government (anyone with an IQ above 10 knows it was him personally) that caused the deaths of 801 Victorians, within weeks neither Andrews nor anyone in government could advise who made that $30Million fatal decision. So were you and your fellow minsters lying under oath or are you just totally and utterly incompetent?
Yes, because this is a totally impartial question to ask in a debate.

You guys (Anti-Dan people) are frothing at the mouth with vitriol, but can't see the double standard in your approach. If things were handled the same was as what you're suggesting, for the Lib/Nats - you'd be crying how unfair it is. Look at Kennett, with a Debate being jointly hosted by the Herald-Sun and Sky news, he said it was unfairly moderated in favour of Andrews. It couldn't have been set up to be any more pro-Liberal, and yet they're still claiming Andrews somehow had a favourable outcome. It's madness.

The second both sides can step back in and have some RATIONAL DEBATE rather than resort to name calling, arguments with no basis in fact, hyperbole, the sooner we can get a decent political system again. The brainless approach of parroting back what the "Thought leaders" in mainstream media and social media want you to do is belittling to yourselves, and everyone else discussing the topic. Fed up with this childish approach to politics, it achieves nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Redford

Tiger Legend
Dec 18, 2002
34,866
27,065
Tel Aviv
What sort of markets are we seeing with the bookies where a Labor majority v minority is concerned ? Any arbitrage opportunities ?
 

Big Tiger

Tiger Rookie
Jul 15, 2013
242
148
Yes, because this is a totally impartial question to ask in a debate.

You guys (Anti-Dan people) are frothing at the mouth with vitriol, but can't see the double standard in your approach. If things were handled the same was as what you're suggesting, for the Lib/Nats - you'd be crying how unfair it is. Look at Kennett, with a Debate being jointly hosted by the Herald-Sun and Sky news, he said it was unfairly moderated in favour of Andrews. It couldn't have been set up to be any more pro-Liberal, and yet they're still claiming Andrews somehow had a favourable outcome. It's madness.

The second both sides can step back in and have some RATIONAL DEBATE rather than resort to name calling, arguments with no basis in fact, hyperbole, the sooner we can get a decent political system again. The brainless approach of parroting back what the "Thought leaders" in mainstream media and social media want you to do is belittling to yourselves, and everyone else discussing the topic. Fed up with this childish approach to politics, it achieves nothing.
They were given a question each at the end to ask each other. If you read what I wrote, you will see it says for Guy not the moderator, so don't need your dribbling rant.
 

The_General

It's been a very hard working from home
Staff member
May 4, 2004
11,047
7,328
They were given a question each at the end to ask each other. If you read what I wrote, you will see it says for Guy not the moderator, so don't need your dribbling rant.
If there's any dribbling in this thread, that bulk of it is coming from yourself and Bengal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user