U mean when Hardwick finishes he's at least coached 3 premierships and Hinkley has none!!Don’t bother
Why Hardwick’s Clarkson-esque trade gamble at Richmond could blow up
The Tigers’ strategy - to go all-in at the trade table and to back in its ageing list - could backfire dramatically and set the club back years.www.theage.com.au
Quick quiz - if you do bother to read it - How many mistakes are in there ? and How many negative assumptions/forecasts does he make about the tigers?
Hawks drafted 5 in the main draft the next two years after 2015.Don’t bother
Why Hardwick’s Clarkson-esque trade gamble at Richmond could blow up
The Tigers’ strategy - to go all-in at the trade table and to back in its ageing list - could backfire dramatically and set the club back years.www.theage.com.au
Quick quiz - if you do bother to read it - How many mistakes are in there ? and How many negative assumptions/forecasts does he make about the tigers?
What are his solid points?I subscribed to read it, it's a pretty good summary of the risk/reward aspects of our strategy.
I don't agree we have an injury crisis but I see how it can appear that way to a layperson, I'm more bullish on what Taranto will bring, less wary about Hopper and disagree on Cotchin, but otherwise I think he makes some pretty solid points.
As always, whoever is right will depend on how the results go. Top 4 or bust.
Nothing that prick says about Richmond is Solid.What are his solid points?
What are his solid points?
What under 22 players have Port got?In a nutshell that we've backed the play of bringing in two players at a significant cost and is the rest of our list in good enough shape to make that wise.
Is 7 years a good investment for those two boys given the potential for our list to drop away in the next few years.
That if our thinking is wrong and we don't get success, it will have set us back on the path to another tilt and will require a longer period to get there.
That apart from Sonsie and Gibcus the talent of our players under 22 is largely unknown at this point and we aren't in a position to access much more talent from last year or this year. If those players don't come on as we would like then there's going to be a big void.
Hardwick isn't necessarily motivated by the long term best interests of the list, because he probably won't stay for the regeneration.
All pretty fair and reasonable points I reckon.
We have just won 3 flags, we have a 10 year rebuild now.In a nutshell that we've backed the play of bringing in two players at a significant cost and is the rest of our list in good enough shape to make that wise.
Is 7 years a good investment for those two boys given the potential for our list to drop away in the next few years.
That if our thinking is wrong and we don't get success, it will have set us back on the path to another tilt and will require a longer period to get there.
That apart from Sonsie and Gibcus the talent of our players under 22 is largely unknown at this point and we aren't in a position to access much more talent from last year or this year. If those players don't come on as we would like then there's going to be a big void.
Hardwick isn't necessarily motivated by the long term best interests of the list, because he probably won't stay for the regeneration.
All pretty fair and reasonable points I reckon.
What under 22 players have Port got?
What's the rush??
R u a Richmond supporterThis might need to be bookmarked to refer to when we lose our first game this season and you are posting in the game day thread.
He's just standing by his original bs when we traded them. Does this moron really expect sudden success with Hop & Taz? 7 years can be mid/long term success.In a nutshell that we've backed the play of bringing in two players at a significant cost and is the rest of our list in good enough shape to make that wise.
Is 7 years a good investment for those two boys given the potential for our list to drop away in the next few years.
That if our thinking is wrong and we don't get success, it will have set us back on the path to another tilt and will require a longer period to get there.
That apart from Sonsie and Gibcus the talent of our players under 22 is largely unknown at this point and we aren't in a position to access much more talent from last year or this year. If those players don't come on as we would like then there's going to be a big void.
Hardwick isn't necessarily motivated by the long term best interests of the list, because he probably won't stay for the regeneration.
All pretty fair and reasonable points I reckon.
The bloke is a kokweed.He's just standing by his original bs when we traded them. Does this moron really expect sudden success with Hop & Taz? 7 years can be mid/long term success.
R u a Richmond supporter
He's just standing by his original bs when we traded them. Does this moron really expect sudden success with Hop & Taz? 7 years can be mid/long term success.
Did Dimma play/coach when this prick played at Port? Maybe something happened then.The bloke is a kokweed.
I can't believe he doesn't go after losers like Longmire and Fagan and constantly goes hard after Hardwick.