Harry said:
Bush couldn't organise a bbq. people have been fed the official story by the mass media and most believe it. the media knew it was Bin Laden 2 minutes after the attack. They even knew WTC7 collapsed before it did. the people pulling the presidents strings also pull the media's. easy to orchestrate the 911 attacks and have people believe your story if you control the media and have it drilled into minds that it's unpatriotic to question the official story. you don't have to police the truth seekers, the general public will do it for you.
how does building 7 collpse in a tidy manner from office fires? the explosions that witnesses heard all over the place? evidence of thermite found in the rubble? how does a passenger plane create the small hole in the pentagon? where was the debris from the plane at the pentagon and the other that fell in the field? how can terrorists manouver such planes and hit their targets? the most heavily protected airspace in the world did not intercept the planes? training drills performed on the same day? bush not responding to "we're being attacked and just sitting there. then saying I watched the first plane hit the tower on TV when it wasn't televised at the time? Silverstein saying pull it before building 7 came down.
re 'pulling the Presidents strings and the media's'. The thing is, powerful and elite interests don't have to come up with elaborate conspiracies to further and protect their own interests. The majority of political theories, Network Theory, Elite Theory, Neo-Marxist Theory, Pluralism Theory, Corporatism Theory all say pretty much the same thing, powerful people have shared interests, and broadly speaking, all row in the same direction, sing from the same songsheet. Its unjust, greedy and pretty sinister at times (such as the current tendency of Mining Corporations and governments understating the adverse affects of coal seam gas), but there is generally no secret conspiracy. There is the odd simple one that would be exposed, and I'm sure there would also be the odd one that wouldn't be (eg, Lord Monkton suggesting that Gina Rhinehart should buy shares in a TV channel and put her CC views forward, that was exposed, but could easily have not been). But generally, I can't see how there could be large scale elaborate conspiracies involving mass murder in a western nation.
As for the people suppressing those questioning the official story, not true. As I states earlier, I was at the s11 memorial service in 2010. I was amazed and impressed at how tolerant and open people were toward the truth movement people, who were there in force. I got a photo of an old bloke holding up a sign saying 'bush bombed NY to spark world War', right near where the podium was where they read the names of the dead. Nobody batted an eyelid. I spoke to a fireman about it, he told me the US believes in free speech. I also saw a big Truth movement rally in washington Square, a sacred site of US democracy, same thing, I asked people why they weren't being abused, everyone was totally fine with it. Amazing and impressive.
As for your questions on building 7, Baloo posted a synopsis of the official report, which addressed the demolition conpiracy theory, including the presence of thermite. And as I said above, people hearing explosions is a red herring, for a few reasons. As for your other points, dunno everything about it, but the Popular Mechanics inquiry found that a lot of apparently compelling contradictions were actually just details that were mis-reported in the chaos.
