ssstone said:
but the facts remain,ivan,in his car did try to abduct paul onions.onions and joanne berry both identified ivan and his nissan patrol
Paul Onions initial report made 10 minutes after the incident you're talking about disappeared from 2 police stations and the notes from the station's log book were ripped out. Why?
There are other reports from a similar timeframe of a man (with a description not matching Ivan Milat) driving a four wheel drive picking up and robbing victims in that area which apparently match the original description given by Paul Onions to Bowral police.
ssstone said:
ammunition found at ivans house had the same batch numbers as the pack of .22 bullets found near gabor neagebauer.dna found on the cord in ivans garage was fond to be consistent with caroline clark.after all this evidence, not forgetting the varios articles of clothing and camping gear that belonged to the murdered backpackers that was found in milats possesion
Channel 7 news footage shows police officers carrying sealed cardboard boxes into Milat's house during his arrest. This is not typical procedure. Why?
Why was none of the evidence finger printed?
A former police officer committed suicide after his wife reported him to police after finding a jacket in his closet that looked exactly like belonging to one of the victims she had seen on TV. After this story hit the media a number of males of varying ages committed suicide in the town of Bundanoon, near to a gun club and Belanglo State Forrest. Why?
On at least one occasion police in that area received reports of a car seen with passengers who appeared to be being held against their will.
Information concerning a suspect who had been a policeman on the NSW South Coast and the son of a senior inspector of police, caused a sensation when published in the Sydney Morning Herald during 1997.
There was no denial that he had been an early suspect, yet the question asked, is how he could have entered the suspects list with consideration to his hair colour and other personal particulars. How adequate was the police investigation when investigating one of their own. To have done so should have led to a deeper probe. They had not bothered to collect any of the items his fiancee had claimed were camping items. Among the property his fiancee said did not belong to him was a black leather jacket. She claimed she had identified the jacket from an ABC television special.
The young constable from Corrimal, Adam Brooks, had dressed himself in full uniform and killed himself at the Corrimal police station. Brooks father then gathered up his belongings at his fiancees home except for the black jacket which belonged to Gabor Neugebauer. Later, the fiancee was visited by Task Force Air detectives who told her that Adam was a suspect in the backpacker murder case. Police strangely did not pursue this line of investigation. The detectives were only interested in following up on Ivan Milat.
The serious question remains, if police had confirmed that Brooks was a suspect, and considering Onions original statement, how come a fair haired suspect later transfer to a dark haired man, Milat? Could this be why Onion's first statement disappeared.
Both Paul Onions and the other man picked up on the Hume Highway described a man around 6 feet tall. Clearly this could not have been Ivan Milat.
The thing that I find most intriguing though is that Milat himself has maintained his innocence the entire time since his arrest, and has taught himself the working of the court system to try and bring about his appeal, which has consistently been denied (why?). I've read alot of books about serial killers and crime in general. I've studied it for a short period and have a my mum deals in criminal psychiatric disorder profesionally. One thing you will note about serial killers is that when they are caught, they will invariably confess to their actions as a way of bragging about what they've done. What makes Milat any different?
ssstone said:
anita cobby.this story makes me pyhsically sick.5 animals abduct,rape,sodimise and kill an innocent woman.if what anita cobby suffered in her last 2 hours on earth,wasnt worthy of the death penalty will someone tell what is.john travers,mick murdoch and the murphy scum should of hung 20 years ago instead of sucking funds from the public purse .no one could possibly argue that these animals have a right to life.
As I said in the other thread, I can see the merits of the death penalty for people who are given fair and due process or who admit to their crimes willingly. Milat fits neither of these categories.