I know you and I have discussed this before, TBR, but there are some things I will never be able to go past when assessing the Essendon situation.
First, they had Dank and, at that time, no other club did. Dank's reputation preceded him. He was dodgy and everyone knew it. Whatever may have been going on at other clubs, there has never been any suggestion it involved the sort of systematic doping regimen overseen by Dank at Essendon. He is now effectively blackballed by Australian sport.
Second, no other team, save for perhaps Geelong when Dank was there, improved with such incredible speed as Essendon during the injections saga. Their subsequent soft tissue injury epidemic was also unprecedented. When lined up with the sharp (pun intended) practices later revealed, it didn't pass the sniff test.
Third, the Essendon players actually had their day—or several, to be truthful—in court and were found guilty. Upon appeal, the original CAS decision was upheld. We need to be very careful to confer guilt—or even suspicion—upon others who have not had that privilege.
Fourth, unlike Ryder, Hunter and others at the Bombers, no player from any other club has publicly aired concerns over whatever supplements they may have consumed as part of any club program. I doubt that is a coincidence.
Finally, I've never understood why any of the ACC, ASADA or WADA would risk their reputation on half-baked or incomplete investigations. This surely throws serious doubt over any claims that other programs came close to the sort of systematic cheating and subterfuge engaged in by Essendon.
Oh, and, of course, let's not forget the main grounds for suspicion ... Essendon's big fat entitlement complex!