Funding per goal | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Funding per goal

Tiger Hammer

Tiger Cub
Apr 3, 2014
92
119
From Useless AFL Stats on Facebook

This makes me :vomit

Earlier last week the AFL Funding dollars were announced - the GWS Giants were the only team to receive over $100,000 per goal kicked in 2022.
Here is a ladder based on dollars spent per goal.

thumbnail_IMG_2929.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

The Lurker

In Victory We Thrive, Eat Em Alive
Nov 24, 2003
852
528
Melbourne
Interesting stuff Hammer, so given we are the best value entertainment in town, suprising that the AFL shaft us ..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Bernie

Tiger Superstar
Aug 19, 2008
1,787
977
Tura Beach
From Useless AFL Stats on Facebook

This makes me:vomit

Earlier last week the AFL Funding dollars were announced - the GWS Giants were the only team to receive over $100,000 per goal kicked in 2022.
Here is a ladder based on dollars spent per goal.

View attachment 17951
That's an amazing table. Thank you Tiger Hammer.

Prima facie, it says the AFL Socialist prescription rewards neither popularity which comes from scoring and success nor prudent fiscal and effective football department management.

But, their Socialist prescription puts a lie to George Orwell's notion that " all pigs are equal but some are more equal than others". Otherwise, we'd lead the list and neither would we be subjected to the apparent AFL adverse bias towards the Tigers.

Whose snout is in the trough?

But more importantly, why?

Perhaps, the table might be enhanced should government and AFL one off grants be included?

I will leave it to you to revise should you wish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Little Ziggyadee

Tiger Legend
Dec 30, 2021
10,864
13,412
48
GW$.

The biggest money pit in the AFL. We're all paying for the orange team.
How many more years do they continue to throw money there way?
They haven't missed a beat since they join the comp.
Finals, GF, Star footballers, but noone cares..
I think GC are better off, i cannot see how they survive if they sit in the bottom half of the ladder for the next 10 years. Every decent kid will walk out.
There was no need for 2 teams in NSW. They don't give a toss about AFL.
 

Bernie

Tiger Superstar
Aug 19, 2008
1,787
977
Tura Beach
There was no need for 2 teams in NSW. They don't give a toss about AFL.

You’re not far wrong with that opinion in my view.

And I base that on being an NSW resident; one who of necessity watches, reads and more importantly, absorbs NSW news on a daily basis.

That’s not to say the game should not be promoted in NSW. But perhaps the the greater investment should be in junior promotion. The Folau initiative failed. The GWS initiative is floundering but will not be denied.

AFL ignorance reigns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

TOT70

I'm just a suburban boy
Jul 27, 2004
9,734
3,802
Melbourne
GW$.

The biggest money pit in the AFL. We're all paying for the orange team.
Every time we buy a membership, every time we go to the footy, every time we buy a pie or a beer, every time we attend a final, the AFL says thank you very much and ships the profits up North. Every time.

Remember all those finals against GWS? The ones attended by 95, 000 Tiger fans and 500 GWS fans?

They just wired the gate takings straight to GWS management to pay for their season.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

ToraToraTora

Two outta three ain't bad.
Mar 21, 2005
12,762
5,562
QLD
GC and GWS will neeeeevvveeer be able to pay their own way. Never ever. Even if they win flags.
 
Jul 26, 2004
78,625
39,435
www.redbubble.com
Every time we buy a membership, every time we go to the footy, every time we buy a pie or a beer, every time we attend a final, the AFL says thank you very much and ships the profits up North. Every time.

Remember all those finals against GWS? The ones attended by $95, 000 Tiger fans and 500 GWS fans?

They just wired the gate takings straight to GWS management to pay for their season.
It's what made the landslide Premiership in 2019 soo sweet. Unfortunately Gil has been punishing us for spanking his baby ever since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Sintiger

Tiger Legend
Aug 11, 2010
18,597
18,640
Camberwell
How many more years do they continue to throw money there way?
They haven't missed a beat since they join the comp.
Finals, GF, Star footballers, but noone cares..
I think GC are better off, i cannot see how they survive if they sit in the bottom half of the ladder for the next 10 years. Every decent kid will walk out.
There was no need for 2 teams in NSW. They don't give a toss about AFL.
The argument the AFL will put up ( with some truth to it) is that because we have the expansion teams there are 22 extra games every year (23 this year) and that pushes up TV rights revenue and their marketing revenue. Whether that is as much as the money they put into GWS and the Suns I have no idea but that argument carries some weight.
I was always of the view that if we were to expand the competition we should so it in traditional footy markets like Tasmania rather than in markets like southern Queensland and western Sydney where those states were already struggling to support one team. A Northern Territory team would be awesome as well but I am not sure they would have the population to support it, which has been the argument against Tassie as well.
 

Baloo

Delisted Free Agent
Nov 8, 2005
44,178
19,050
Looking at the table one can only assume the AFL will see how they can level the playing field by restricting the goals we score.
 

Tigerhealer

I'm a llama!
Sep 7, 2003
368
531
It's what made the landslide Premiership in 2019 soo sweet. Unfortunately Gil has been punishing us for spanking his baby ever since.
and the 2020 Premiership
see Gils face after the game ? shocking was next to him with the same face
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

tigertim

something funny is written here
Mar 6, 2004
30,130
12,560
The argument the AFL will put up ( with some truth to it) is that because we have the expansion teams there are 22 extra games every year (23 this year) and that pushes up TV rights revenue and their marketing revenue. Whether that is as much as the money they put into GWS and the Suns I have no idea but that argument carries some weight.
I was always of the view that if we were to expand the competition we should so it in traditional footy markets like Tasmania rather than in markets like southern Queensland and western Sydney where those states were already struggling to support one team. A Northern Territory team would be awesome as well but I am not sure they would have the population to support it, which has been the argument against Tassie as well.
On the population argument, we‘re told it’s about “eyeballs” now ie the tv viewing audience and the broadcast rights so does not having the population matter?

We were told they put GWS in Western Sydney because there’s 2M people there (and the Gold Coast area because it has “reach “ to over 1m) but they get pretty average attendances. I’d hazard a guess the footy going public of Tassie would get very similar attendances to the Suns (ave 14k ish over the last 2 seasons) and the Giants (17k and 14k over the last 2 seasons)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

ceehook2

Tiger Matchwinner
Feb 11, 2021
833
1,438
64
I like the bottom 3 in that table , to me it suggests both the admin and footy depts are doing well

we just have to keep doing what we are doing and when the stars align we will see silverware
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

TigerFurious

Smooth
Dec 17, 2002
3,628
4,868
Over half the clubs are now dependent on the AFL for survival and as result, do what they are told when they are told to do it by HQ. The rest don’t even get enough in distributions to cover the salary cap. On top of that, the recent restrictions to football department spending means the well off clubs cannot reinvest their financial success back into their core business of winning games of footy. At least not without significant penalty anyway.

If they’re is ever a breakaway league and we all wonder how it got started, look no further.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user