My god, I don't know how many times I have to explain the industry standard of 30-year baselines and climate normals. You just keep regurgitating it as though it's chicanery.You believe what you want to believe Lee, I don't believe anything about climate change, I look for credible evidence presented accurately and then form opinions based on evidence rather than beliefs.
Which brings me back to your favourite luke-warmists, the mob at Uni of Alabama Huntsville, who don't seem to get their updates posted here when they show warming.
Their October update has come back with warming of 0.35C over their deceptive recently altered baseline. They are trying to give the impression of less warming by changing their baseline from 1981-2010 to now being 1991-2020. If we went back to their previous baseline the warming is 0.51C. Of course their previous baseline doesn't go back beyond the point when we started pumping gigatonnes of carbon into the atmosphere, but the satellite measures don't go back beyond December 1978 so there is a good reason for that baseline. What is also noticeable about their "measure" of warming is that it is an outlier, not only is it claiming less warming than surface measure, but they claim warming of 0.14C per decade, in contrast to the other satellite measure of temperature which claims warming of 0.214C per decade. Given UAH are the outliers you really have to conclude they have an agenda: they moved their baseline to minimise the headline figure and their findings are below just about all other measures.
It is happening and it is serious, no matter what some want to believe.
DS
Happy to post the chart, there is no significant difference.