It’s like he just makes everything upAnyone else hear this dumb goose on SEN this morning? Quoted: "Sonia Hood needs plan A, B, C, D, F and E".....twice!!
Even gaffed that Luke Jackson's going to North Melbourne. How do they motormouths like this bewilders me.
Put him in to a aged home care. I think the poor little wrinkled up bastard has dementiaAnyone else hear this dumb goose on SEN this morning? Quoted: "Sonia Hood needs plan A, B, C, D, F and E".....twice!!
Even gaffed that Luke Jackson's going to North Melbourne. How do they motormouths like this bewilders me.
I listened, it was hilarious. He said it correctly a little later, without acknowledging he had *smile* it up previously.Anyone else hear this dumb goose on SEN this morning? Quoted: "Sonia Hood needs plan A, B, C, D, F and E".....twice!!
Even gaffed that Luke Jackson's going to North Melbourne. How do motormouths like this get media jobs bewilders me.
Definitely will. I crucify myself in listening to Crutchy and Pickers at times.I listened, it was hilarious. He said it correctly a little later, without acknowledging he had *smile* it up previously.
I was hoping a caller would bring it up with him. Surely it makes OTB on Saturday morning?
Ok, we,ll play at PRO instead!At it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore
At it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore
I was listening too this morning. He actually said it “how is it fair that Richmond get a massive free kick with the number of games they play at the G”.At it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore
At it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore
Heard someone call in towards the end having a go at him, and sounded lost for words. What a joke this moron is.I was listening too this morning. He actually said it “how is it fair that Richmond get a massive free kick with the number of games they play at the G”.
That irked me a bit. So I looked up who played where in 2022.
Richmond _ 14 games at the G
Collingwood - 14 games at the G
Melbourne - 15 games at the G.
These games are a combination of home and away games as we play each other at the G.
So I texted in as I was annoyed, asking how does this translate into a massive free kick to Richmond when we have been a tenant since the 1950’s. Collingwood same number of games and Melbourne 1 more. Not a free kick for them?? Was it a free kick to us in 2016 when we finished 13th?? Or only a huge bonus since 2017?
Geelong, had 6 games at the G, 4 home and 2 away and then a heap at the Cattery, playing their narrow ground in front of their adoring fans as no-one else can get in.
Also questioned his snipe at us taking 2 top quality players from a bottom 4 side and asked what was his opinion of Port taking the number 1 pick from the team that won 2 games for the year. Queried if that was a bit close to home for him to be critical of that.
Didn’t hear it read out.
This is not new. Going in to every season for the past 20 odd years there are maybe eight teams apparently capable of winning it. Midway through the season that number has halved and by finals it’s down to two or three genuine contendersAt it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore
I was listening too this morning. He actually said it “how is it fair that Richmond get a massive free kick with the number of games they play at the G”.
That irked me a bit. So I looked up who played where in 2022.
Richmond _ 14 games at the G
Collingwood - 14 games at the G
Melbourne - 15 games at the G.
These games are a combination of home and away games as we play each other at the G.
So I texted in as I was annoyed, asking how does this translate into a massive free kick to Richmond when we have been a tenant since the 1950’s. Collingwood same number of games and Melbourne 1 more. Not a free kick for them?? Was it a free kick to us in 2016 when we finished 13th?? Or only a huge bonus since 2017?
Geelong, had 6 games at the G, 4 home and 2 away and then a heap at the Cattery, playing their narrow ground in front of their adoring fans as no-one else can get in.
Also questioned his snipe at us taking 2 top quality players from a bottom 4 side and asked what was his opinion of Port taking the number 1 pick from the team that won 2 games for the year. Queried if that was a bit close to home for him to be critical of that.
Didn’t hear it read out.
Next he will want a cap on supporters.At it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore
The reason why the SA clubs dont attract players is cos they are in SA.At it again this morning on SEN He pontificated that only 8 clubs could win the premiership next year and that the have nots will never be able to climb the ladder with things the way they are. He feels equalisation measures are not working
He had several solutions and guess what - they involve teams "like Richmond"
So Richmond ( and then he grudgingly added Collingwood but it was richmond first should not get to play in front of big crowds on the MCG so often as this means the clubs that dont will lose players who want to play in front of big crowds No mention how this would work ie are we to be consigned to small grounds so we can no longer play in front of big crowds
then the club that has won 3 premierships in 5 years is able to take 2 players from the club that finished bottom 4 ( no mention of the fact that said bottom 4 club had a down year this year but before that had finished in top 4 for years and was a grand finalist 3 years ago
Next was if you are a top team you are not able to participate in free agency
Again no mention of other clubs just us
I know i know click bait, turn off , all of that but it is very hard to ignore