PT, yes yes, all true probably, but it won't stop me using the "when England decide they need help" line.The reason for some sporting bodies having the separate components of Great Britain as competing members and other sporting bodies having Great Britain in its entirety, is not some conspiracy theory of the English choosing when they “need the rest of the others” or not.
It’s simply a legacy of the very early days of competition in these sports, when there weren’t really many other countries to play internationals against. So the “home nations” played among themselves. Given they were founding members of that sport, to honour this tradition, there’s never been any suggestion to wind it up to compete as Great Britain.
And they have...Our basketball team needs to find a bit….
They pick and choose based on when England think they need help.
Olympics - GB
Rugby League - GB
FIFA World Cup - Eng, Sco, Wal, Nth Ire
Rugby Union - Eng Scot Wal - Ireland and Northern Ireland compete as one team
Commonwealth - Split
It's all a bit odd.
The reason for some sporting bodies having the separate components of Great Britain as competing members and other sporting bodies having Great Britain in its entirety, is not some conspiracy theory of the English choosing when they “need the rest of the others” or not.
It’s simply a legacy of the very early days of competition in these sports, when there weren’t really many other countries to play internationals against. So the “home nations” played among themselves. Given they were founding members of that sport, to honour this tradition, there’s never been any suggestion to wind it up to compete as Great Britain.
I love them.I like the Argentine girls hockey teams. Just sayin…
An Irishman who plays for England is no Irishman.
The reason for some sporting bodies having the separate components of Great Britain as competing members and other sporting bodies having Great Britain in its entirety, is not some conspiracy theory of the English choosing when they “need the rest of the others” or not.
It’s simply a legacy of the very early days of competition in these sports, when there weren’t really many other countries to play internationals against. So the “home nations” played among themselves. Given they were founding members of that sport, to honour this tradition, there’s never been any suggestion to wind it up to compete as Great Britain.
Rugby league not quite right. There is an England rugby league side but they also compete as Great Britain, in a similar way to Rugby Union that play as each nation but also as the British and Irish Lions.
Again it depends on your definition of a country, for a lot of people this means somewhere you wouldn’t need to seek independence from another governing entity. No need for glasses in the face as long as definitions of language are understood.Try telling the Scots or the Welsh they are not indeed indeed separate countries and they will tell you to go *smile* yourself, regardless of the peculiarities of the Union. Of course the Scots in particular want more independence than they have now.
You know. Think I remember discovering them when I was a randy teenager watching the Atlanta Games. Them and the Spanish ladies team were quite a hit to my teenage eyes.I like the Argentine girls hockey teams. Just sayin…
I believe Australia and New Zealand also competed as a combined Australasia team in one of the early modern Olympics too.The Lions tour a different country 4 years I think whereas Great Britain for League happens every 2 years against Aus (The Ashes), not sure about other countries.
There was an ANZAC rugby team once. Played one match against the Lions during the 89 Tour.
View attachment 12941
They are very talented.You know. Think I remember discovering them when I was a randy teenager watching the Atlanta Games. Them and the Spanish ladies team were quite a hit to my teenage eyes.
@Baloo 's explanation seems much more logical to meThe reason for some sporting bodies having the separate components of Great Britain as competing members and other sporting bodies having Great Britain in its entirety, is not some conspiracy theory of the English choosing when they “need the rest of the others” or not.
It’s simply a legacy of the very early days of competition in these sports, when there weren’t really many other countries to play internationals against. So the “home nations” played among themselves. Given they were founding members of that sport, to honour this tradition, there’s never been any suggestion to wind it up to compete as Great Britain.