What l find amusing is,some people talk about the ignore function,and yet don't use it and continue calling people racist etc .
I guess some of us dont think racism is something that should be ignored.What l find amusing is,some people talk about the ignore function,and yet don't use it and continue calling people racist etc .
I have not seen any direct racist comments ,yet l have seen plenty of the keyboard warrior brigade make assumptions that someone is racist etc.I guess some of us dont think racism is something that should be ignored.
But without knowing how much work this section creates, i agree with those who have said keep it open so the discussions can stay here, and kept away from other threads, and away from those posters who arent interested.
you also have to look at the legality that someone may cross the line with the wrong person one day .
I have not seen any direct racist comments
Due to many reports this thread poses more problems for PRE as a website and as a community.
So I propose a vote, which will be open for 7 days before the result is actioned.
Only thing wrong with this thread or any other thread, is when the punters on the thread start hurling insults n abusing other posters. Have the discussions, place your point of view good, bad or indifferent but leave the insults n derision for the face to face over the drip tray gatherings. That way the mods don't have to do any work.The essence of this vote appears to me to be (and correct me if I am wrong) that our Mods, who freely volunteer their time to keep this running and often put their hard earned in to it as well, are struggling with the amount of issues this thread generates.
While I am all for free speech, freedom of thought and everything else, it concerns me that the Mods are having to spend a significant amount of their valuable time on a thread the is not what the site is essentially about.
I love this site, and would hate to see it close down.
I think we all need to be mindful that this site is about the mighty RFC, and footy related discussion. I'd rather close this thread than even contemplate the possibility of losing that.
If people feel that strongly that this thread be retained, I think they should consider volunteering to moderate the thread.
is when the punters on the thread start hurling insults n abusing other posters.
Everyone has different levels of what they deem to be nasty personal attack which can make things difficult.But is serious abuse? I mostly see 'woke' 'apologist' 'racist' 'socialist' 'communist' 'nazi'
Avoid the board, use ignore, toughen up
I personally try not play the man or woman and ive never reported anyone
But ive got half a dozen on ignore.
I also got summarily excecuted on the adam goodes thread back in the day. From memory i called the moderator and site owner? racist.
Now if you cant say racist and racism on the adam goodes thread, you might as well shut her down.
It would be akin to making 'fend' a banned word on the dustin martin thread
Are there indirect racist comments? What is the difference?I have not seen any direct racist comments
You missed "being a senior ".But is serious abuse? I mostly see 'woke' 'apologist' 'racist' 'socialist' 'communist' 'nazi'
Avoid the board, use ignore, toughen up
I personally try not play the man or woman and ive never reported anyone
But ive got half a dozen on ignore.
I also got summarily excecuted on the adam goodes thread back in the day. From memory i called the moderator and site owner? racist.
Now if you cant say racist and racism on the adam goodes thread, you might as well shut her down.
It would be akin to making 'fend' a banned word on the dustin martin thread
The guilty ones are no putting their hands up are they ?.Ill pay that