Yeah it's slightly petty but I enjoyed this. Gave a good indication that Albo runs rings around Dutton. A step ahead.
Good onya Albo & what a horrible piece of *smile* that Dutton isYeah it's slightly petty but I enjoyed this. Gave a good indication that Albo runs rings around Dutton. A step ahead.
Not just petty, but *smile* embarrassing for Dutton. So embarrassing the Lib spin doctors rolled our Laudry, supported by other female Lib NPs, and tried to twist it so that Laudry was being bullied by the PM when in fact he was smacking down Dutton.Yeah it's slightly petty but I enjoyed this. Gave a good indication that Albo runs rings around Dutton. A step ahead.
Is that twitter video really all it was? It cant be. Surely. Can it?Not just petty, but *smile* embarrassing for Dutton. So embarrassing the Lib spin doctors rolled our Laudry, supported by other female Lib NPs, and tried to twist it so that Laudry was being bullied by the PM when in fact he was smacking down Dutton.
So what do you think the mainstream media ran with? Dutton the Boofhead or Albanese the Bully?
Is that a hypothetical question?Not just petty, but *smile* embarrassing for Dutton. So embarrassing the Lib spin doctors rolled our Laudry, supported by other female Lib NPs, and tried to twist it so that Laudry was being bullied by the PM when in fact he was smacking down Dutton.
So what do you think the mainstream media ran with? Dutton the Boofhead or Albanese the Bully?
yep, the COAT was laughing like a *smile* hyena she was that distressed.Wow, they have sunk to a new low rolling out the party women like that.
An incredibly distressing experience?
Yep backfired spectacularly. Thought he was being clever to hijack what Albo was saying but just ended up looking like a fool out of his depth.It was beautifully played by Albanese, almost channelled a bit of Keating.
The LNP are a laughing stock.
it's terrible
yeah the justice system eh? so weird..Higgins trial postponed for another 4 months due to a technicality in jury protocol. First time I've seen this.
Why can't they just use this evidence?
Higgins is not on trial. Lehrmann is.
Geez, that lot are looking collectively constipated. Tucker at parliament house must be dodgy.
That may be true.Higgins is not on trial. Lehrmann is.
That may be true.
But it's up to the accuser to prove the case, defendant doesn't have to do anything especially not by opening their mouth n helping the accuser to prove their case.
The 'outside material' was just research done by that juror. How can this be part of any evidence on what actually happened? Maybe dismiss the juror only? Strange outcome this case.
He should be in jailAfter hearing some of the evidence at the first day of the Robodebt Royal Commission I am left shaking my head as to how Stuart Robert is still an MP
They had legal advice that it was not lawful before it started, quite apart from the moral questions.