Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

Great press conference. Plenty of further leads to follow up out of that, but my favourite part was where she threw Hockey under the bud.
 
poppa x said:
I think it's interesting that this thread is by and large anti-Abbott, and yet the wider community prefers him to Shorten.

according to polling in the age, victoria prefers Labor 58 V Libs 42. (this is not surprising as Victorians are clearly smarter than the rest of Oz.)
whilst that is far from exact, it would suggest that the wider Vic community does not prefer Abbott.

still waiting for any positives re Abbott.
i might have one tho- he doesnt catch $5000 helicopters to save 20 mins each way to attend Lib party events and charge it to the tax payer.
 
Victorians are clearly smarter than the rest of Oz.

Two things wrong with this.
One, it's clearly a ridiculous generalisation. I wonder what our Interstate PRE's think about this?
Two, it begs the question. We were comparing Abbott and Shorten, and you've changed the argument to Labor and Liberal.
Which sorta makes your quote wrong. Assuming you're a Victorian.

Just sayin'
 
poppa x said:
Two things wrong with this.
One, it's clearly a ridiculous generalisation. I wonder what our Interstate PRE's think about this?
Two, it begs the question. We were comparing Abbott and Shorten, and you've changed the argument to Labor and Liberal.
Which sorta makes your quote wrong. Assuming you're a Victorian.

Just sayin'

Quote a poll which says Abbott is more popular than Shorten poppa.

I'll do it for you - in fact Toned Abs did top Bill Shyten as preferred PM in May this year (News Poll), but the June Fairfax poll in June put Bill back in front. BIll's probably been hit by the Royal Commission For Taking Revenge on the Labor Party and Labor Movement, but knowing Toned he'll be back in the doldroms fairly soon.

After all there are only so many appeals to protecting borders and keeping us safe surrounded by Australian flags that he can make before even the dimmest of voters realises he ain't got nothing else.
 
Tigers of Old said:
Can you believe Bronnie?! Arrogant to the extreme. This Government has complete contempt for the public.

Chartering a helicopter. FFS.

CKFu-D4UsAAtxhg.jpg
 
Brodders17 said:
so 48 hours later, or actually 3 years later, and noone has any good to say about Abbott as PM.

complaining about lack of balance on this thread is like complaining about lack of balance in the climate change debate. if all the evidence points one way it is reasonable to expect all the commentary will point that way too.

It's true that it is very difficult to think of any positives for Abbott. As a Liberal supporter I can't think of any myself. However Liberal (or Labor) voters don't have a say in the leader of their party. I can think of many positives to say about Liberal pollies such as Turnbull and Miss Julie. I can't think of anything positive about Bill or any of the other Labor pollies. In fact I can't think of too many Labor pollies apart from Bill, which is one of the major issues with the Labor Party.
 
tigersnake said:
Yeah exactly. Why are there no far-right ABC journos or Uni academics? Not becuase these organisations are conspiratorial 'lefty lynch mobs', its Because their ideas don't stand up to rational, evidence-based, logical scrutiny.

Research has shown conservatives are less intelligent. Maybe this shows Tiges barrackers are generally smarter?
I've given you too much credit. Head in sand stuff!
 
Giardiasis said:
Haha people think they're smart because they prefer Labor to Liberal :cutelaugh

Theoretically we can all be smart. It's when stuff is put into practice that the smarter types engage in debate.
 
poppa x said:
There ya go.

Still haven't seen a thing from you regarding positives of Abbott. Do you have anything other than comparing him to Shirten?
 
Baloo said:
Theoretically we can all be smart. It's when stuff is put into practice that the smarter types engage in debate.
Agreeing with each other isn't debating.

The point is there really isn't anything material that separates Labor and the Libs. Same *smile* different smell.
 
Giardiasis said:
Agreeing with each other isn't debating.

The point is there really isn't anything material that separates Labor and the Libs. Same sh!t different smell.

The ultra-left agrees with you on that.
 
Gee it's a sad state of affairs when nobody, not even the staunchest supporters from a few years ago, can come up with a positive about our prime minister.
 
evidently a press release where Abbott demands Gillard sack Slipper as Speaker was taken down from his website a couple of days ago. obviously even he and his party acknowledge his double standards.

(my early comment about Vics being smarter was well and truely tongue in cheek.)
 
Giardiasis said:
Agreeing with each other isn't debating.

The point is there really isn't anything material that separates Labor and the Libs. Same sh!t different smell.

disagree at the moment.
one party believes in climate change, the other is scrapping any assistance to renewables.
one party supports those less well off, at least a little. the other party has budgets that hits those with less harder.
one party believes it appropriate to knight a very very wealthy foreigner.

there are differences.
 
Tigers of Old said:
Here comes the 15% GS-TAX.. and some people are worried about a price on carbon!

Out of what can be done, I think a hike in GST is a good move. I just don't know if bumping it that high is so great. If the govt knocks off Stamp Duty, as was promised with the GST's introduction, along with a complete overhaul of the taxation system, it would go a fair way to getting things on a sensible track.
 
K3 said:
Out of what can be done, I think a hike in GST is a good move....

I heard on the radio this morning that it won't affect people under $100,000 annual income. How can that be possible when groceries and fuel and every day items have additional GST added? I might misunderstand it but I reckon it hits the poorer demographic worse than the rich end of town.