Global Warming | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Global Warming

MD Jazz

Don't understand football? Talk to the hand.
Feb 3, 2017
13,566
14,140
I'm not promoting inequality, just pointing out what the data shows.

What we need to do is to stop this silly idea that we can grow and grow and grow our consumption on a finite planet.

For all the bluster about emissions reductions, we keep increasing emissions. Most of the emissions in China come from factories relocating to China. They do this because of cheap and readily available labour, but you also need energy and infrastructure. Plus, all those relocated factories exporting goods are contributing to warming as we move all the goods around the world.

Unless we are willing to take the risks of climate change we need to adapt to a far less consumerist society.

DS
Tell that to the growing economies.

BTW I agree with you to a large extent, we need to have a major shift away from rampant consumption. Getting rid of a majority of marketing and advertising firms would be a start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

RoarEmotion

Tiger Legend
Aug 20, 2005
5,147
6,910
It’s a massive problem of externalities.

The externalities of future lives and their quality of life and non human lives just don’t weigh up in any decision making as you don’t have to pay for abusing them.

Building things that last, making things repairable, sharing in a community things that you use once a month or a year etc would make a difference - but it makes companies earn less. We have libraries, but people will still want to own their own copy of a book.

Capitalism in its current form generates many great outcomes but it is also generates massive exploitation of externalities. We are going to need a massive revamp of our system or it is hard to see how we do anything but accelerate towards the cliff edge especially as TM put it, can’t see anyone who was wealth like most aussies giving it up to hunt kangaroos with sticks.
 

DavidSSS

Tiger Legend
Dec 11, 2017
10,754
18,459
Melbourne
I think if you ask those in Northern NSW and Southern Queensland at the moment, or Eastern Victoria at the start of 2020, they will tell you that these are not future externalities, they are very much current externalities.

The sooner we get on to reducing CO2 emissions the easier and less painful it will be.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Panthera Tigris

Tiger Champion
Apr 27, 2010
3,757
1,784
We could all go back to living in caves n chasing possums bare arsed with a pointy stick n all the worlds pollution n climate change problems would sorta disappear.

Unfortunately the two thirds of the world who don't have the luxury of all the " modern privileged society " want a share of the good stuff that we have n we also don't want to give up the good stuff we already have n go back to living in caves sittin in the dark n freezing our arses in winter.

World's simply gunna keep consumering n polluting till the *smile* hits the fan n all the posturing n protesting won't make a scrap of difference.
Well also, if humans were to live such an existence, I have seen analysis that suggests the earth could probably only support 80 to 100million people as an absolute max, living a hunter gatherer lifestyle. So 7.8billion people would need to go out of existence for that to occur. Not sure which 7.8bn people would volunteer for that.

Despite popular perception, a hunter gather existence actually has a larger per head impact on the sustainability of the planet for human habitation. Obviously different strains on the environment than an industrialised existence. But per head, a greater impact nonetheless. It's kind of a natural, self sustaining, self fulfilling loop. Think of it like if too many animals live in an area, they run out of food and die off to a more sustainable population size. It works the same way.

By discovering modern agriculture, modern manufacturing, modern science and medicine - general industrialisation. It's the central reason as to why humans have been able to to break out of the natural self fulfilling balance and grow in numbers beyond what the humanity/nature balance would self regulate. It's a double edged sword where the human population at anywhere close to the current magnitude cannot survive without these industrialised systems in place. But the industrialised systems will eventually kill the planet for human habitation anyway.
 
Last edited:

Baloo

Delisted Free Agent
Nov 8, 2005
44,179
19,054
Sending everyone back to poverty won't work. But it sounds like the rich developed countries should invest as much as they can into renewable energy technologies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,922
11,944
Well also, if humans were to live such an existence, I have seen analysis that suggests the earth could probably only support 80 to 100million people as an absolute max, living a hunter gatherer lifestyle. So 7.8billion people would need to go out of existence for that to occur. Not sure which 7.8bn people would volunteer for that.

Despite popular perception, a hunter gather existence actually has a larger per head impact on the sustainability of the planet for human habitation. Obviously different strains on the environment than an industrialised existence. But per head, a greater impact nonetheless. It's kind of a natural self sustaining, self fulfilling loop. Like how if too many animals live in an area, they run out of food and die off to a more sustainable population size. It works the same way.

By discovering modern agriculture and modern manufacturing - general industrialisation. It's the central reason as to why humans have been able to to grow in numbers beyond what the humanity/nature balance would self regulate. It's a double edged sword where the human population at anywhere close to the current magnitude cannot survive without these industrialised systems in place. But the industrialised systems will eventually kill the planet for human habitation anyway.
So eventually we'll simply end up travelling in ever decreasing circles n disappear up or own clackers. At least until we manage to find some sort of equitable balance.
 

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,922
11,944
But it sounds like the rich developed countries should invest as much as they can into renewable energy technologies.
Sounds like a great idea, but as is currently happening the rich n developed countries simply price themselves out of the market while trying to create fancy new technologies. While the developing countries utilize all the cheap n nasty disgusting fossil fuels to manufacture all of the comsumerism stuff we want cheap n stink up the entire planet as they try to improve their own life situation.
Still on the ever decreasing circles merry go round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

DavidSSS

Tiger Legend
Dec 11, 2017
10,754
18,459
Melbourne
But a very large proportion of China's emissions come from factories relocated to China by western companies to make goods to be exported back to the west. We can hardly blame them for what we do.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

MD Jazz

Don't understand football? Talk to the hand.
Feb 3, 2017
13,566
14,140
But a very large proportion of China's emissions come from factories relocated to China by western companies to make goods to be exported back to the west. We can hardly blame them for what we do.

DS
Interested to know how companies relocate to China as foreign ownership is complicated in China. Do you have links to demonstrate how a large proportion of production in China has been from relocations?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Panthera Tigris

Tiger Champion
Apr 27, 2010
3,757
1,784
So eventually we'll simply end up travelling in ever decreasing circles n disappear up or own clackers. At least until we manage to find some sort of equitable balance.
You said it more succinctly and efficiently than I. I was always that kid at school who wrote well, but lost considerable marks for going over the word count, or ran out of time during the written answer exam questions. I could talk under water, but didn't have that ability to put it into fewer words. :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

mrposhman

Tiger Legend
Oct 6, 2013
18,196
22,031
Interested to know how companies relocate to China as foreign ownership is complicated in China. Do you have links to demonstrate how a large proportion of production in China has been from relocations?

Not necessarily directly relocated, but there would be numerous examples of companies closing their domestic factories and then using outsourced providers within China (alleviating the issue over equity control of factories within China).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,922
11,944
Not necessarily directly relocated, but there would be numerous examples of companies closing their domestic factories and then using outsourced providers within China (alleviating the issue over equity control of factories within China).
Yep. On top of that you also have the capacity for Chinese companies to buy the brand name of existing but struggling international companies then simply marketing their own products under a globally recognised moniker.
 

DavidSSS

Tiger Legend
Dec 11, 2017
10,754
18,459
Melbourne
Yep. On top of that you also have the capacity for Chinese companies to buy the brand name of existing but struggling international companies then simply marketing their own products under a globally recognised moniker.

Yeah, but if you have ever seen the way an MG was put together back in the day that might be a good thing :p

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,922
11,944
Yeah, but if you have ever seen the way an MG was put together back in the day that might be a good thing :p

DS
Wasn't that much wrong with the old Pommie motoring industry back in the day, they had some classic motors. Just stuffed up by a bit of bovver with the unions n inability to modernise.

MG now Chinese
Jaguar, first Ford then Tata India
Rover went British Leyland subsidiary then Honda built some of their motors n then got swallowed up by Tata
Rolls Royce is now a fancy Bimmer
Bentley is now a posh Vee Wee
Aston Martin had a relationship with Ford n played up a bit with Benz but still exists as basically British.
Austin, Morris, Leyland etc pretty much a nightmare n whatever scraps might still exist somewhere I'm pretty sure are buried under a carpet in China
Vauxhall are General Motors.

Pretty sad historical decline for their entire industry that it's pretty much all been swallowed up by other manufacturers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

royce67

Tiger Rookie
Jun 4, 2008
379
352
Hobart
Wasn't that much wrong with the old Pommie motoring industry back in the day, they had some classic motors. Just stuffed up by a bit of bovver with the unions n inability to modernise.

MG now Chinese
Jaguar, first Ford then Tata India
Rover went British Leyland subsidiary then Honda built some of their motors n then got swallowed up by Tata
Rolls Royce is now a fancy Bimmer
Bentley is now a posh Vee Wee
Aston Martin had a relationship with Ford n played up a bit with Benz but still exists as basically British.
Austin, Morris, Leyland etc pretty much a nightmare n whatever scraps might still exist somewhere I'm pretty sure are buried under a carpet in China
Vauxhall are General Motors.

Pretty sad historical decline for their entire industry that it's pretty much all been swallowed up by other manufacturers.

All powered by Lucas Electrics: The Prince of Darkness!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user

DavidSSS

Tiger Legend
Dec 11, 2017
10,754
18,459
Melbourne
All powered by Lucas Electrics: The Prince of Darkness!

Don't ever remind us, appalling electricals.

I once had a mini, the head gasket went so I replaced it. I noticed that it was a mm or 2 off in various places but, this was the first time I had replaced a head gasket so figured it was just normal. A few years later I rebuilt the motor on an old Nissan Patrol. Now, this was an old model so had the Bedford motor (designed by a UK motor company, but made by Nissan). When replacing the head gasket I noticed it was millimetre perfect. Now this is a head gasket, it needs to be right, the compression of the motor, the water and oil running through the block and the head, all need to be perfectly sealed and the gasket needs to be spot on, not "close enough". The Lucas electricals were a nightmare too!

My neighbour used to own an MG (Midget I think). He once showed me a steering arm. The arm had about 4 ball joints. Why? Because the steering arm had to go around the suspension which was in the way. How the f*ck do you design the front end of a car where the suspension gets in the way of the steering? It is nonsensical, if this happens you redesign the front end. Needless to say the steering on that car was not good.

The poms have made some good cars but geez they made some crap - badly designed, badly made and mediocre.

Anyway, got a bit off topic, but they have put out some terrible cars over the years.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

DavidSSS

Tiger Legend
Dec 11, 2017
10,754
18,459
Melbourne
From that article:

The Associated Press reported that one weather station in Antarctica beat its all-time record by 15C, while another coastal station used to deep freezes at this time of year was 7C above freezing. In the Arctic, meanwhile, some parts were 30C warmer than average.

Beating a record by 15C, that is simply astounding.

What a mess.

DS