General Trade Discussion 2022 | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

General Trade Discussion 2022

Redford

Tiger Legend
Dec 18, 2002
34,922
27,165
Tel Aviv
Moot issue at the moment. JVR, Brown, Bauer etc all haven’t played one single game of senior AFL football yet so determining winners and losers is years off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

code yellow and black

Tiger Rookie
Sep 21, 2014
274
395
Now that the trade season is done, I am amazed that a team like North didn't grab the Bowes/7 deal. Surely they have salary cap space and they need the new talent at pick 7 or even trade 7 for a classy mid. Perplexing...
The talk was that cats were already into Bowes at the start of the year.

Maybe they had inside info that he would departing for salary cap reasons and there would be an incentive to take him on (I.e early draft pick).

Possibly other teams including north had no chance (to get Bowes) as they were so far behind the 8 ball. Only finding out about the salary damp recently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Dont Argue

Tiger Legend
Jun 26, 2018
5,777
12,388
Moot issue at the moment. JVR, Brown, Bauer etc all haven’t played one single game of senior AFL football yet so determining winners and losers is years off.
Where’s the fun in discussing young players if you’re only dealing in facts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

King Kong

Tiger Legend
Aug 26, 2016
6,127
5,321
The talk was that cats were already into Bowes at the start of the year.

Maybe they had inside info that he would departing for salary cap reasons and there would be an incentive to take him on (I.e early draft pick).

Possibly other teams including north had no chance (to get Bowes) as they were so far behind the 8 ball. Only finding out about the salary damp recently.
Notice the AFL are making noises about closing the salary dump window again. How convenient - they open it for this deal and then say that didn't work so we're going to change it back. How *smile* stupid do they think we are?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

spook

Kick the f*ckin' goal
Jun 18, 2007
22,319
27,619
Melbourne
Between them and Melbourne, they have the biggest front running fans in the league.

When they aren’t top 4 certs, they go missing very easily and very quickly the Hawthorn fans.
Exclusive footage of your average Melbourne/Hawthorn fan:

Melbourne will play VanRooyen very early next year. They think he's a major part of their woes next year.
Reverse psychology? "C'mon kid! We know you can't do it!"

Don't confuse Jackson's defection with Grundy's value, two separate issues, I'm looking at each trade in isolation and weighing up the value.

1. Grundy (pick 27 & 300k salary)

Outstanding value, particularly if the sub gets scrapped for an extra player

2. Mitchell (pick 41 & 50 & part salary)

Pretty good bet, low ball risk in a draft with potentially 50 selections.

These were the classic Moneyball trades, both players still have good football left in them & could easily finish top 5 in the B&F. Both Collingwood & Melbourne fair weight for top 4 so a premiership would vindicate these additions. In the case of Melbourne they haven't necessarily had a net gain, more stabilising the list but they improved their draft hand this year & next.
There's talk Collingwood's offer to pay 300k of Grundy's salary was if they got a first-rounder. For pick 27, Melbourne might be stumping up 850. They can obviously afford it, probably by paying bare minimum for key forwards but you get what you pay for.

Mitchell will be interesting to watch under Fly. Will have to be rebroken to use the ball forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

spook

Kick the f*ckin' goal
Jun 18, 2007
22,319
27,619
Melbourne
Notice the AFL are making noises about closing the salary dump window again. How convenient - they open it for this deal and then say that didn't work so we're going to change it back. How *smile* stupid do they think we are?
They don't care if we're stupid or see right through them as many of us do. They just care that we're powerless.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 8 users

Redford

Tiger Legend
Dec 18, 2002
34,922
27,165
Tel Aviv
Exclusive footage of your average Melbourne/Hawthorn fan:


Reverse psychology? "C'mon kid! We know you can't do it!"


There's talk Collingwood's offer to pay 300k of Grundy's salary was if they got a first-rounder. For pick 27, Melbourne might be stumping up 850. They can obviously afford it, probably by paying bare minimum for key forwards but you get what you pay for.

Mitchell will be interesting to watch under Fly. Will have to be rebroken to use the ball forward.
The Isotopes are awesome.
 

DavidSSS

Tiger Legend
Dec 11, 2017
10,720
18,366
Melbourne
What they need to get rid of is clubs paying opposition players, it means some clubs are playing a team which is getting paid more than the salary cap.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

turk-d-tiger

Welcome to Richmond Football Club - Daniel Rioli
Dec 1, 2007
5,235
4,508
melbourne
If you look at the ruck depth across the entire AFL this trade represents even more bang for the buck. Plenty of pensioners still offering their services well into their 30s, Stef Martin (35), McEvoy (33), Ryder (34), Goldy (34), Hickey (32 next season), Stanley (32 next season), Mummy (35 upon retirement).

I reckon the risk with Grundy has been overblown, second best ruck in the comp with plenty of football left.
How many of them would you pay $700k a year for ?
martin , McEvoy & Mummy have all been cooked for their last 2 years and Stanley is an athletic beast that has cray physical attributes but not a genuine Ruck imo. Ryder yes but has probably missed as much as he has played.

But i dont rate Rucks highly unless they are Gawn level (which i rate alot higher than Grundy as a player not just Ruck)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,854
11,852
It is about monitoring breaches. If the cap is $13m and a club has $14m in contracts in place for next year, they have breached the rules.
Nah. That's a potential breach next year, because it's still this year they aren't breaching yet. All they have to do is dump a player or two off the list during trade week and they're in with a clean sheet for next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,854
11,852
Who's to say North didn't try, I think at some stage they said a lot of clubs were interested but as GC were jettisoning Bowes from their club like a piece of trash, it was totally Bowe's decision on who he narrowed his choices down to and who would choose North.
That said he has made a bold choice for himself picking the Cat's that he can break into their midfield, if he can he has chosen well if not he will have just shortened his career whereas as Geelong will have the consolation of the player they pick at pick 7.
Reckon Bowes has played it fairly smart. Pretty sure he restricted the possibles to Hawforn, Essendrugs n Moggies, then chose the Moggies.
Hawforn, just finished cleaning out their closet so he'd probably be a walk up start there but not much chance of team success for a while.
Essendrugs, simply all over the shop with their coaching, admin n list management in recent years so who knows what the hell he'd be getting into.
Moggies, well run club n competitive forever so he's extended his years for a short term pay cut but ultimately more shekels overall. Duckwood gone, Clench nearly gone, Guffrie, the proper one, nearly gone, Tooheys nearly gone, Puncan n Manygollies also nearly gone so there'll be plenty of opportunities opening up for him to finally become a regular senior player in the next couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

TigerMasochist

Walks softly carries a big stick.
Jul 13, 2003
25,854
11,852
Schache has at least kicked 24 goals in a season, that would probably be the rationale if he can hit those heights.
He'd be seriously spudding up if he can't manage 30 goals a year with Smelbourne's dominant mid field supplying him ball. Gawn / Grundypants ruck combo with Peetrakka, Olly, Viney, Harmes, plus Brayshaw, Salem etc bringing the ball forward.
 

waiting

Tiger Legend
Apr 15, 2007
14,058
9,171
Victoria
They don't care if we're stupid or see right through them as many of us do. They just care that we're powerless.
Yeah they didn’t like the look of it but were helpless ( if you want to believe that , no proper rules in place ) and allowed it through to the keeper.

How convenient it was the Cats.

Now they will close it !

Or the rule is , example in the case of Bowes if a club takes this on they have to pay the full salary that his previous club had him on.

$800 k
$ 1.6 mil for the 2 years not be allowed to spread it over 4 years with a slight increase over the four years.

If I was a player manager of Bowes or any player in the future with the club trying to offload my client because they stuffed up their TPP, bad luck.

The AFL should come down hard on a club in the future and stipulate it in the rules, inform clubs that if they breach their TPP they are barred from participating in the draft.

They lose all their draft picks in the draft the year they breached their TPP.

Fine them also the amount they were over.

But I’m sure with the AFL’s love children the GWS & GCS there will always be a loophole as they did this time.

Clubs should be held to account for not having their house in order and clubs who take up what the Cats shouldn’t be afforded the luxury of gaining pick 7 and then playing hardball when dealing for Henry and not allowing Ratugolea to find a home……
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

bullus_hit

Whatchu talkin about Jack?
Apr 3, 2006
15,227
5,668
How many of them would you pay $700k a year for ?
martin , McEvoy & Mummy have all been cooked for their last 2 years and Stanley is an athletic beast that has cray physical attributes but not a genuine Ruck imo. Ryder yes but has probably missed as much as he has played.

But i dont rate Rucks highly unless they are Gawn level (which i rate alot higher than Grundy as a player not just Ruck)
I think Grundy has 3 years of elite football left, after that he'll be overpaid but not superfluous, I think it's a fair trade-off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

shad

Tiger Champion
Apr 6, 2010
2,649
2,057
Castlemaine
I think Grundy has 3 years of elite football left, after that he'll be overpaid but not superfluous, I think it's a fair trade-off.
Me and my son used to love watching Grundy at his best. He was a dominant player. Deadset gun.

That seems like a long time ago now though-maybe 2018?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

bullus_hit

Whatchu talkin about Jack?
Apr 3, 2006
15,227
5,668
Me and my son used to love watching Grundy at his best. He was a dominant player. Deadset gun.

That seems like a long time ago now though-maybe 2018?
2021 was a good year, this year not too bad but injury struck & Cameron & Cox presented as a cheap alternative. I reckon this one comes back to bite, Melbourne vs Collingwood has added interest, particularly around finals time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

shad

Tiger Champion
Apr 6, 2010
2,649
2,057
Castlemaine
2021 was a good year, this year not too bad but injury struck & Cameron & Cox presented as a cheap alternative. I reckon this one comes back to bite, Melbourne vs Collingwood has added interest, particularly around finals time.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'good'. He was a star for quite a while. Looking at his Brownlow votes there has been a fair drop-off since 2019. The graphs heading downwards. 2018- 17 votes=10th, 2019-23 votes=6th (same as Dusty), 2020-6 votes, 2021-9 votes, 2022-1 vote.
 

hutstar

Tiger Superstar
Dec 17, 2002
2,435
985
Florida
2021 was a good year, this year not too bad but injury struck & Cameron & Cox presented as a cheap alternative. I reckon this one comes back to bite, Melbourne vs Collingwood has added interest, particularly around finals time.
Agree, Grundy still has plenty of good footy in him. People over-react to present circumstances and underestimate long-term evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user