Are they looking t the dangerous tackle on Bakes? When he was slung into the ground with a secondary action and his head whiplashed a bit into the turf? I didn’t notice it yesterday at the ground in the contest but it was pretty clear today watching the replay. Guess not.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Welcome Liam Baker
- Thread starter Tigermad2005
- Start date
Agree. Nothing to lose. I can't see medium impact at all in this. Even Bakes had copped an injury as shown on the news.
No you suspend on the action not the injury, the potential to cause injury is the overriding factor 1 week was warranted IMO
There is precedence that this is not the case. Last week Pendlebury for example.
Sorry Smoking but precedence does not prevail is this day and age, action couldn't be much later by Bake's, luck does not get you off and a fine does not deter.
Strange that opponents can try to rip Bakes head off most games or caught in a sling tackle and nothing to see but when he clumsily clatters an opponent he gets pinged. A fine yes but no way a week off
Yep seems to depends on the player and more importantly what guernsey they are wearing.
