2013 Election Year Party Policies- Liberal | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

2013 Election Year Party Policies- Liberal

rosy23 said:
that's a despicable policy. pay people a fortune to have kids then skimp on their welfare. absolutely stuffed up priorities. childcare workers should be respected and valued more to attract the best people possible to care for the kids.

Exactly. As someone with a kid in a wonderful childcare centre atm, you can really see the immense difference that quality childcare brings to the life of a young'n; she loves going there; comes home with a smile and stories to tell; talks about making new friends etc etc To me the exact same truths come into play for teachers, and I am constantly amazed that these two groups are treated as unskilled, unimportant and people to have to battle for the respect, and credit, they deserve.

Are polies so far removed from where most of us live that they can't see how vital quality care, and education, is for all children?
 
Here is an article on the Lib's childcare and aged care thinking


Late Coalition policy seeks to reduce childcare staff numbers
Date September 6, 2013 - 6:51PM

Dan Harrison

A Coalition government would seek to slow or abandon requirements for childcare centres to lift staff numbers in child-to-staff ratios and employ more highly qualified workers.

The Coalition posted its childcare policy on its website late on Thursday, without issuing a press release or making an announcement.

In a shift from the Coalition's previous public position, the document says it would work with state and territory governments to slow down implementation of changes which require centres to lift the ratio of staff to children. It would also seek state and territory agreement to pause requirements for higher staff qualifications.

Under the National Quality Framework, centres are required to have a worker for every four children under two years of age, every 5 children aged two to three, and every 11 children from three to preschool age.

The timeline for implementation of each requirement varies between states. By January next year the framework also requires half of all staff to have or be working toward a diploma level qualification, with remaining staff required to have or be working toward a certificate III qualification. Centres with 25 children or more must have at least one degree-qualified early childhood teacher.

The Coalition document says it supports National Quality Framework "in principle" but is concerned by reports that its implementation is causing staffing and administrative problems which are pushing up fees.

The Coalition document also floats a proposal to allow Family Day Care providers who have had no serious incident for five years to take an extra child under preschool age. It also states it will not approve any further spending from the $300 million Early Years Quality Fund, set up by Labor to provide pay rises for childcare workers.

The document says the Coalition would honour contracts already made, and remaining funds would be retained in the childcare portfolio.

The Coalition's aged care policy – also published online late on Thursday without an announcement – makes clear it will take a similar approach to wages in aged care, ending a $1.2 billion Labor scheme to lift wages in that sector, and returning the money to the general aged care funding pool.

Early Childhood Australia chief executive Samantha Page said the organisation had been a strong advocate of the quality reforms and was "very sad to see the Coalition wanting to delay and water down those reforms."

Louise Tarrant, the national secretary of United Voice, the childcare workers union, said the Coalition could not on the one hand note the difficulty in attracting enough professional staff to work in the sector while at the same time taking away the first step toward delivering professional wages.

Prue Warrilow, the national convenor of Australian Community Children's Services, which represents not-for-profit childcare providers, said the policy was "really disappointing" and the timing of its release did not give families time to properly consider the Coalition proposals.

She said providers had had four years notice to implement the quality reforms which should have been "more than adequate," and she was concerned negotiations with states and territories could lead to a loss of national consistency.



Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2013/late-coalition-policy-seeks-to-reduce-childcare-staff-numbers-20130906-2taix.html#ixzz2eAe59eib