Reported with confidence Bowes is on $825K for each of next two years. Yikes.
Yeah at that number, I'm out on the idea. $550k-600 I was open to do it.
But that's madness.
Reported with confidence Bowes is on $825K for each of next two years. Yikes.
No way that could be true.Reported with confidence Bowes is on $825K for each of next two years. Yikes.
According to footywire he'll be a restricted fee agent when he comes out of contract at the end of 2024. That means he'll be one of their top 10 earners that year.No way that could be true.
I think the money part could be done - especially if Fridge leaves. About $550k per year smoothed out over 4. Capacity would be there if you consider that we could make a run at Logue and then, if Fridge leaves have his salary free as well. Port will be throwing more than $550k at Fridge as well so Fridge and other players won’t get their noses out of joint I wouldn’t have thought.According to footywire he'll be a restricted fee agent when he comes out of contract at the end of 2024. That means he'll be one of their top 10 earners that year.
$1.65m over two years. Tough to smooth that out. Even if you extended his deal to four years and he agreed to be on match payments for the final two years (why would he), you'd be paying an average of at least half a mil per year. (Someone else will offer him more.) And to get it done along with Taranto and Hopper would almost certainly mean trading out the much-loved Soldo and Graham. I don't think anyone's coming for George, so we'll be lucky to be relieved of his contract. Trading Short would do it, but again, much-loved.
I just don't see how we could do it without putting noses out of joint.
Yeah the money could be done, but you don't reckon players would be annoyed if we pretty much forced out their future captain?I think the money part could be done - especially if Fridge leaves. About $550k per year smoothed out over 4. Capacity would be there if you consider that we could make a run at Logue and then, if Fridge leaves have his salary free as well. Port will be throwing more than $550k at Fridge as well so Fridge and other players won’t get their noses out of joint I wouldn’t have thought.
The real issue for me is the the pick back that they supposedly want. Don’t want 7 being watered down to something like the equivalent of 15 or whatever.
I think the money part could be done - especially if Fridge leaves. About $550k per year smoothed out over 4. Capacity would be there if you consider that we could make a run at Logue and then, if Fridge leaves have his salary free as well. Port will be throwing more than $550k at Fridge as well so Fridge and other players won’t get their noses out of joint I wouldn’t have thought.
The real issue for me is the the pick back that they supposedly want. Don’t want 7 being watered down to something like the equivalent of 15 or whatever.
Would have to be a 4 year deal, would probably require 4 x 500k to beat off the competition & satisfy Bowes management. As far as a pick going back is concerned, pick 30 the absolute highest, however I'd even be somewhat resistant to that suggestion. Don't forget that over the duration of the Bowes contract we'll be seeing salary cap relief from the likes of Cotchin, Riewoldt, Grimes, Dusty, Pickett, Tarrant & Lynch.According to footywire he'll be a restricted fee agent when he comes out of contract at the end of 2024. That means he'll be one of their top 10 earners that year.
$1.65m over two years. Tough to smooth that out. Even if you extended his deal to four years and he agreed to be on match payments for the final two years (why would he), you'd be paying an average of at least half a mil per year. (Someone else will offer him more.) And to get it done along with Taranto and Hopper would almost certainly mean trading out the much-loved Soldo and Graham. I don't think anyone's coming for George, so we'll be lucky to be relieved of his contract. Trading Short would do it, but again, much-loved.
I just don't see how we could do it without putting noses out of joint.
I think the money part could be done - especially if Fridge leaves. About $550k per year smoothed out over 4. Capacity would be there if you consider that we could make a run at Logue and then, if Fridge leaves have his salary free as well. Port will be throwing more than $550k at Fridge as well so Fridge and other players won’t get their noses out of joint I wouldn’t have thought.
The real issue for me is the the pick back that they supposedly want. Don’t want 7 being watered down to something like the equivalent of 15 or whatever.
Well, technically, havent they sort of already done that by throwing dollars at Logue ?Yeah the money could be done, but you don't reckon players would be annoyed if we pretty much forced out their future captain?
Again, you’ve already thrown dollars at Logue. All you’re doing is throwing a few more per year over 4 to get pick 7 and the player (Bowes) instead of the player Logue.Either way, on top risk around team harmony/culture, am of the not sure (well am) you want to hold a player on your books you don't want until end of 2026 on $550K a year.
Especially if contending and looking to add more talent (plus keep Shai and Sampilands) in coming years.
That $$ goes a long way towards a free agent.
And no guarantees who you take at 7 works out anyway. It's a big swing, risking quite a few things to get that player right.
Again, you’ve already thrown dollars at Logue. All you’re doing is throwing a few more per year over 4 to get pick 7 and the player (Bowes) instead of the player Logue.
The real issue from a pure trade and value perspective - which nobody has discussed - is if GC (supposedly) want a pick back.
That’s the bigger issue with the whole deal.
Again, you’ve already thrown dollars at Logue. All you’re doing is throwing a few more per year over 4 to get pick 7 and the player (Bowes) instead of the player Logue.
The real issue from a pure trade and value perspective - which nobody has discussed - is if GC (supposedly) want a pick back.
That’s the bigger issue with the whole deal.
Yep - me too. That price is too high to successfully reframe.Yeah at that number, I'm out on the idea. $550k-600 I was open to do it.
But that's madness.
Based on what I heard this week, and adding the fact Chimp is in his last year and Graham a half decent chance to leave as well, our midfield is DEFINITELY in need of more bolstering beyond Taranto and Hopper.I don't agree with the Griffin Logue argument. Fairly paid AFL KPP who we identified as a player we want v a grossly overpaid VFL HBF who don't want. Different money, different types of players.
Based on what I heard this week, and adding the fact Chimp is in his last year and Graham a half decent chance to leave as well, our midfield is DEFINITELY in need of more bolstering beyond Taranto and Hopper.
And pick 7 is what addresses your kpp focus as well.
You love De Goey.Agree re: midfield. Not with a Bowes type though.
To add to Tarooper, we will need pace and zip.
We also need decent finishers & Bowes is a good kick, he's the link man when the contested nuts dish the ball out. Sprint time is 3 seconds flat, that's not terrible, better than average which is 3.07 sec.Agree re: midfield. Not with a Bowes type though.
To add to Tarooper, we will need pace and zip.