911 Truth Movement

[Disco08]

 

[Soda]

To put these events in perspective, imagine that a person leases an expensive house, and immediately takes out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks. Six weeks later two bombs go off in the house, separated by an hour. The house burns down, and the lessor immediately sues the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately wins. The lessor also gets the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.

A bit of a twisted perspective? Bombs?

Given that house is the prime target in the biggest city in the biggest capitalist nation, and given the rise in recent times of anti-US/capitalist terrorism nsurance against a terrorist attack would be considered prudent. The timing coincided with the purchase so nothing unusual there.

Back to larry, are you suggesting he got some guarantees about the cover-up cleanup (don't worry we'll get rid of the evidence before a proper investigation can take place), insurance claim (don't worry we'll rig the judges and you'll get your cash), re-construction costs (don't worry we'll help out with re-construction costs) etc prior to the event? For a man who has built his own destiny/fortune he is leaving a lot in the hands of others don't you think? He is jeopordising his whole lifes work on some extra cash? He is happy to sacrifice thousands of fellow american lives for this? So much potential for it all to unravel, why would a man already wealthy risk his whole life on this?

 

[Disco08]

Well his mates were running the PA and the US. You tell me.

Why would Larry drastically overpay for the lease on buildings his mate tried for years to demolish because they weren't commerially viable (presumably) when another of his mates was getting warning after warning that the buildings were under imminent threat of having commercial jets flown into them if not to cash in on the insurance?

 

[tigertim]

Anyone see 'Conspiracy Theory Road Trip' on ABC 2? It was good. Dude took 4 pommy conspiracy theorists about the London 7/7 bombings and took them on a road trip to investigate key conspiracy pillars. It was very similar to this thread. Only 1 was sticking to his guns by the end. He kind-of conceded on some key points, but would then say 'but that doesn't disprove all this other stuff. He reminded me of someone.

Hope its on iview

I watched this a few months ago. I actually found it to be disappointing and dull so only watched half of it.

 

[tigertim]

To put these events in perspective, imagine that a person leases an expensive house, and immediately takes out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks. Six weeks later two bombs go off in the house, separated by an hour. The house burns down, and the lessor immediately sues the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately wins. The lessor also gets the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.

Yep, thats a very good analogy of what happened..............

 

[tigersnake]

To put these events in perspective, imagine that a person leases an expensive house, and immediately takes out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks. Six weeks later two bombs go off in the house, separated by an hour. The house burns down, and the lessor immediately sues the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately wins. The lessor also gets the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.

The only mildly interesting thing about this is that a conspiracy theorist finds it in any way compelling.

 

[AngryAnt]

It is compelling, because the World Trade Centre had never been attacked by terrorists ever before.


oh wait

 

[Disco08]

It is compelling, because the World Trade Centre had never been attacked by terrorists ever before.


oh wait

I watched this a few months ago. I actually found it to be disappointing and dull so only watched half of it.

The only mildly interesting thing about this is that a conspiracy theorist finds it in any way compelling.

So glad to see that the quality of your arguments have remained constant while I've been gone.

 

[tigersnake]

So glad to see that the quality of your arguments have remained constant while I've been gone.

?? We've been through the whole Harvey shooting match, Disco, probably more than once. But then you post that as if it provides compelling new info or insight

 

[Disco08]

Not sure what you're on about but no doubt you'll decline to offer any real reasoning.

 

[evo]

To put these events in perspective, imagine that a person leases an expensive house, and immediately takes out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks. Six weeks later two bombs go off in the house, separated by an hour. The house burns down, and the lessor immediately sues the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately wins. The lessor also gets the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.

the analogy doesn't sound nearly as implausible when you include the fact the next door neighbours house had already been "bombed' previously.

 

[tigertim]

So glad to see that the quality of your arguments have remained constant while I've been gone.

Were you gone?
Oh well, so glad to the quality of your sanctimony has remained constant.

 

[AngryAnt]

Saint Disco of Ground Zero.

Patron saint of tin foil and thermite arsonists.

 

[tigertim]

Saint Disco of Ground Zero.

Patron saint of tin foil and thermite arsonists.

I think Disco would be more of the Saint Jude type, Patron Saint of lost causes.

 

[Disco08]

Timmy and anty. PRE's intelligentsia. :cutelaugh

the analogy doesn't sound nearly as implausible when you include the fact the next door neighbours house had already been "bombed' previously.

So for some reason Larry added a clase to his insurance that released him from his 99 year lease in case of a terrorist attack even though he was so keen on getting the towers he payed way over market value for them despite inside knowledge of two of his mates that should have sent him running the other direction. Makes sense.

 

[tigersnake]

Not sure what you're on about but no doubt you'll decline to offer any real reasoning.

Thought it was pretty clear.

We have been over every single so-called coincidence associated with Harvey's insurance. Yet you are now posting as if none of that discussion ever happened. I don't have any new arguments or info. What is the point of discussing it again? If you weren't convinced then you never will be.

 

[1eyedtiger]

159 pages of this thread!

Are we any closer to the truth? How will we know if the truth becomes known? There will always be skeptics.

If not, how does anyone propose we come to know the truth? After all, there's no such thing as an 'independent' investigation. Someone is always holding the purse strings and the the outcome will always reflect that.

 

[AngryAnt]

159 pages of this thread!

Are we any closer to the truth? How will we know if the truth becomes known? There will always be skeptics.

Disagree, just give Disco some time alone with Larry S in a locked room. After a couple of hours of being subjected to Disco's patented theories and "research", Larry would roll over and confess to anything, case closed.

 

[Disco08]

Ant already knows the truth 1eyed. He's just that clever.

An independent investigation is far from impossible as you suggest though.

Thought it was pretty clear.

We have been over every single so-called coincidence associated with Harvey's insurance. Yet you are now posting as if none of that discussion ever happened. I don't have any new arguments or info. What is the point of discussing it again? If you weren't convinced then you never will be.

Sorry. Didn't realise Harvey was Larry.

Agree we've been over it enough. The logic is pretty clear but you'll never see it.

 

[Panthera tigris FC]

Ant already knows the truth 1eyed. He's just that clever.

An independent investigation is far from impossible as you suggest though.

Sorry. Didn't realise Harvey was Larry.

Agree we've been over it enough. The logic is pretty clear but you'll never see it.

Yes Duckman. You alone can see it.