ARC Appeal | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

ARC Appeal

fastin bulbous

Tiger Champion
Mar 30, 2010
4,194
4,344
Darwin
Or mount a sensor on top of the posts pointing up and if it goes beep it hit the post but this wouldn’t have worked in lynches case as it clearly went straight through the middle of the big sticks!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Quickdraw

End of the drought
Jun 8, 2013
2,890
4,404
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Nico

You psychopathological reactionary!
Jul 1, 2004
2,276
2,063
Melbourne
I still believe 2 Goal umps at each end is the answer to 99% of the issues
Agreed Taz. An ump under each post for a set shot (2 goal, 2 boundary umps) and a goal ump under each goal post in general play. This will ensure there's always an ump under the flight of the ball, and both umps can confer on goal line decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

taztiger4

Shovelheads- Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Jul 13, 2005
7,848
6,508
Richmond Victoria
Agreed Taz. An ump under each post for a set shot (2 goal, 2 boundary umps) and a goal ump under each goal post in general play. This will ensure there's always an ump under the flight of the ball, and both umps can confer on goal line decisions.
you are a smart man Nico :)
 

graystar1

Tiger Legend
Apr 28, 2004
6,879
1,801
I still believe 2 Goal umps at each end is the answer to 99% of the issues
That is not a bad idea but, the snick would be a lot cheaper than paying another four officials every week at every game.
That would be 4 extra umpires to cover each end.
Huge cost, but if affordable then not too bad.
 

The Big Richo

Tiger Champion
Aug 19, 2010
3,154
5,024
The home of Dusty
The club would be doing themselves a gross disservice making pricks of ourselves rather than focus on the road ahead , nothing at all good could come from it

True, but that's never worried Hardwick before. He's not a shrinking violet on these matters.

So leave the call to the goal umpire...it's what he's paid to do....make the call!

Amen brother!
That is not a bad idea but, the snick would be a lot cheaper than paying another four officials every week at every game.
That would be 4 extra umpires to cover each end.
Huge cost, but if affordable then not too bad.

They have the snicko type thing in the posts but it is only useful if you haven't got 100kg blokes crashing into everything in the area while the ball goes past.
 

Nico

You psychopathological reactionary!
Jul 1, 2004
2,276
2,063
Melbourne
That is not a bad idea but, the snick would be a lot cheaper than paying another four officials every week at every game.
That would be 4 extra umpires to cover each end.
Huge cost, but if affordable then not too bad.
There's already a snicko on the posts, and it would only require 1 additional goal ump at each end. Goal umps earn way less than field umps so cost not that great.
 

graystar1

Tiger Legend
Apr 28, 2004
6,879
1,801
There's already a snicko on the posts, and it would only require 1 additional goal ump at each end. Goal umps earn way less than field umps so cost not that great.
Did not know that about the snicko.
Can't remember ever seeing it used.
You are right about the extra umpires though Nico.
Still would have to have an extra 2 at every game every week and finals.
 

achillesjones

"just kick it to Royce"
Apr 19, 2004
3,577
3,004
I still believe 2 Goal umps at each end is the answer to 99% of the issues
Yeah nah. Position of goal umpire was ok. Just force them to make a decision and leave it at that. The more involved, the murkier it gets. Umpires make mistakes all the time. The arc is a total waste of money and source of frustration. Give the arc money to charity and we can all move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Butch67

Tiger Rookie
Mar 31, 2014
403
646
Wasnt the snicko used in the 19 PF when jack had that shot from close to the boundary in the last qtr. Its a great excuse to go and watch that game again anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

King Kong

Tiger Legend
Aug 26, 2016
6,127
5,321
Wasnt the snicko used in the 19 PF when jack had that shot from close to the boundary in the last qtr. Its a great excuse to go and watch that game again anyway.
Snicko cost us a Bolton goal in the Qualifying Final against the Paddle Pop Lions in 2020 when we were finishing hard. Funny how we are always on the receiving end of these reviews
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

BillyJean17

Tiger Champion
Jul 27, 2009
4,144
2,289
melbourne
True, but that's never worried Hardwick before. He's not a shrinking violet on these matters.



Amen brother!


They have the snicko type thing in the posts but it is only useful if you haven't got 100kg blokes crashing into everything in the area while the ball goes past.
dimma has most def pulled his head in was way more circumspect and affable for best part of the year , I suspect some guidance was had , the new dimma gagged himself on this one
 

Maneevo

Tiger Matchwinner
Feb 13, 2011
510
136
Agreed Taz. An ump under each post for a set shot (2 goal, 2 boundary umps) and a goal ump under each goal post in general play. This will ensure there's always an ump under the flight of the ball, and both umps can confer on goal line decisions.
Sounds like the right solution while we wait until they are prepared to fork out for decent equipment. But the AFL will want to receive the advertising dollars associated with video decisions . The more video decisions made, the more money the AFL can sell the advertising spot for. It wasn’t implemented to get more decisions correct. $$$$
 
Last edited:

tigersnake

Tear 'em apart
Sep 10, 2003
23,738
12,226
That is not a bad idea but, the snick would be a lot cheaper than paying another four officials every week at every game.
That would be 4 extra umpires to cover each end.
Huge cost, but if affordable then not too bad.
4 extra? I make it 2 extra. Huge cost? Really? I guess if fans think this way it underlines the AFL tendency to penny pinch on umps. (and spend like drunken sailors on their exec mates).
 

TigerPort

Tiger Champion
Jun 29, 2006
2,544
2,785
NSW
2 extra goal umpires per game per round would depend on whether they reuse the goal umpires on multiple days per round. Makes sense to do that. So say need 12 extra goal umpires per round and then needs spares. So lets say need 20 new goal umpires to cover the extra goal umpire requirement. Pay them $50K for the season each means the AFL needs to find $1million from somewhere.

Total attendances over the AFL season is around 6 million. So the AFL could increase ticket prices by $0.17 cents to cover the additional cost
 

RoarEmotion

Tiger Legend
Aug 20, 2005
5,120
6,826
2 extra goal umpires per game per round would depend on whether they reuse the goal umpires on multiple days per round. Makes sense to do that. So say need 12 extra goal umpires per round and then needs spares. So lets say need 20 new goal umpires to cover the extra goal umpire requirement. Pay them $50K for the season each means the AFL needs to find $1million from somewhere.

Total attendances over the AFL season is around 6 million. So the AFL could increase ticket prices by $0.17 cents to cover the additional cost
They have gone with extra field umpires. Surely cheaper in the long run to invest in state of the art tech than extra people.

This is from 2012 where a goal umpire cost $k60 so at 5% a year would now be just on $k100 / goal umpire.