I think there are a lot of people seriously over-estimating what is possible in terms of working out what is going on in peoples' minds. We are not even close to understanding how the brain works, so far away it is not funny.
The biggest problem I see with AI is that it could take jobs away without reducing working hours. Let's face it, if AI replaces lots of jobs we should all be working maybe 20 hours a week and certainly not 5 days a week. But that's just not how this system works, it will shove people out of jobs, profits will rise, and people will be sent to the scrap heap.
DS
I'd suggest have a listen. This stuff is going to develop exponentially.
Everyone having a personal computer in their pocket that is also a camera, map, social connectivity device etc. has happened in a couple of decades. Doubt anyone could have predicted 20 years ago what we see now with how pervasive that is in our lives and how it influences what we do.
With regards to job loss - It's a debate that's occurred throughout history as technology has evolved. The luddites a classic one who railed against mechanised looms and knitting frames putting skilled artisans who spent their life learning their craft out of work. No phone operators any more to connect our calls, or accountants doing spreadsheets manually with pencil and paper.
So far more jobs have been generated to replace the jobs that have gone but who can say if history will repeat or not.
Often when stuff gets cheap, we get more of it (spreadsheets is a good example) where the amount of accountants needed to do a spreadsheet went down massively, but the amount of questions that could now be asked inexpensively went up exponentially - leading to more demand for analytical work. (and lots of people who have since learnt how to use Excel!)
That doesn't mean for those impacted it isn't a massively negative life changing event.
Writers striking now because of this threat to their livelihood. Who would have thought a computer could write a TV script with just some human direction a decade ago?
The 'dumb AI / algorithm' of tik-tok has already lead to teenagers committing suicide and changed their brains by learning what keeps our attention on the screen and we can think of plenty of examples where it has been successfully used to spread false information.
Why is it so strange to think that in 20 years or maybe even less AI could know our emotions and maybe even visualise what we are thinking via a device plugged into our ear to listen to music? (especially when a company or government can get profits/power from that). After all our brain has these signal going around already - just in a way that is very personal.