He should have driven it through his chest. Amiss grabbed him and dragged him down. I wish he had broken his ribs.Reckon Miller gave Amiss a brutal knee drop
Could be looked at
Loved it though, especially from Miller
How was a player who CANNOT KICK drafted in the first place.Yeah I really want Ralphsmith to work and I’m sure the club does too.
But footskills ain’t at the standard.
I think it was a second dropHe should have driven it through his chest. Amiss grabbed him and dragged him down. I wish he had broken his ribs.
Broad got kneed in the head earlier, but "protecting the head" is out the window when someone is trying to take a hanger.Reckon Miller gave Amiss a brutal knee drop
Could be looked at
Loved it though, especially from Miller
I think its section 3, rule 21.5(a), the retaliator shall be penalised, not the instigator.He should have driven it through his chest. Amiss grabbed him and dragged him down. I wish he had broken his ribs.
We've been beaten by a better side, no problems with that, but these umps are fair dinkum stuffed.
Very Dylan over the last year or so. Sad to see a gun player go too long.Some of his efforts are very un Dylan. He’s mentally flat.
Well said JJD!Today was the first crack in the Yze philosophy. Too many took the easy option. The effort must improve. We all know the situation with injuries. The players played a selfish game that we have not seen in a long time. Good coaches do not allow that to fester. We are going to find out how much the players are being coached over the next 6 weeks. That’s when we’ll know about Yze. Can he fix the crack that opened today.
They got frustrated in the end. It's tough when you don't feel the game is being adjudicated fairly. And it is not the first time. I don't blame players for getting frustrated. I think the club is letting them down by not being more vocal about it. I wouldn't feel. Baker is a ball player yet gets no support from the umps. Nank is often penalised simply for being too aggressive. We bemoan weak tackles then you get a strong tackle and its judged too strong. We seemingly cannot win. I think that will make something like 40 games of over -9 free kick differential and not one in the positive. Different players, different opponents, different umpires......why?We've fought hard in every game until today. Was only a matter of time until the players threw in the towel.
At present, the umpire could walk into a pack, kick one of our players, probably pay a free to the opposition for umpire contact, and the AFL would sign it off as okay.They got frustrated in the end. It's tough when you don't feel the game is being adjudicated fairly. And it is not the first time. I don't blame players for getting frustrated. I think the club is letting them down by not being more vocal about it. I wouldn't feel. Baker is a ball player yet gets no support from the umps. Nank is often penalised simply for being too aggressive. We bemoan weak tackles then you get a strong tackle and its judged too strong. We seemingly cannot win. I think that will make something like 40 games of over -9 free kick differential and not one in the positive. Different players, different opponents, different umpires......why?
I hear noise of affirmation leads to positive counts for home sides in WA & SA. There is possibly no more vocal crowd than the tigers yet noise of affirmation does not apply to us.
It's pretty dis-heartening. I have a lot of empathy for the players.