I am not confusing anything here. He could impact the situation with money and resources, i agree. He could also do this from Mars tiger. His location means *smile* all to me apart from if you simply want him to politicize the situation. I dont want him too. I really hope these requests will be forthcoming.I clearly said he had no effect on these bushfires. You are trying to set up a narrative that doesn't exist just so you can rail against it.
Also, you're confusing being a good leader with being stubborn and inflexible. Good leaders adapt when all the evidence says they need to. Look what Dimma did in 2017. They are also visible and present.
It's a little mind blowing to believe the blind devotion required to suggest that Scomo has shown good leadership in this circumstance. If leaving the country to go on holiday during a national emergency is good leadership, what's bad leadership?
To make my position clear, he did not go AWOL.
In relation to leadership. Look what Kevin Rudd did and Julia Gillard and Shorten, they were told by their bulldogs to change course mid shift without due process and wow look what we as a country said to all of them. Scott is doing what he said he would do and is doing it well, you just dont like his path. The majority of us do.
Nothing mindblowing here, just a bit of resiliance against a minority with a big attitude.
Do you know that some of the people who your share your opinion have stated on here that they want him dead. And you think i have blind devotion.
Calmness is needed, consistancy is needed and support needs to be given. The protesters need to get off the lawn in sydney, the streets of brissy and *smile* off to support the fireys, their contribution is derelict at the moment and shameful to say the least.