It's disgusting. How can they still be getting score reviews wrong?Harry said:Ratogalia non mark paid. Goal.
Prestia non holding the ball paid. Goal.
Higgins goal not paid.
Vlastuin sliding free not paid. Goal.
4 goals from the umps.
Farce
It's disgusting. How can they still be getting score reviews wrong?Harry said:Ratogalia non mark paid. Goal.
Prestia non holding the ball paid. Goal.
Higgins goal not paid.
Vlastuin sliding free not paid. Goal.
4 goals from the umps.
Farce
Mantikorr said:It's disgusting. How can they still be getting score reviews wrong?
artball said:how many free kicks don't we get ??
TigerForce said:holding the ball is non existent for us.
Tenacious Tiges said:Thing that gets me is when Martin gets tackled he gets a micro second to dispose of the ball before the Umps blow the whistle. They are so edgy to blow it when he gets tackled whereas Ablett etc have all night. It’s bias. You could prepare a video clearly showing the time difference.
Huh? Ch 7 showed another angle front on where it didn't hit the post at all.Bill James said:Goal review was totally right. Goal umpire calls that it hit the post, there is no way that replay can overturn that.
Once again there was vision available that they didn't use. the last replay which the reviewer didn't use shows the ball missing the post by plenty!!!Bill James said:Goal review was totally right. Goal umpire calls that it hit the post, there is no way that replay can overturn that.