good on him! pinched my joke....
We were on -17 2 games ago. We're being umpired differently last 2 weeks.Just a point of order.
We’ve played 5 games.
Geelong, Western Bulldogs and Brisbane have played 4 games.
So our usual position is resumed. We drop to 18.
From the aged
Frustrated goal umpires met AFL football operations boss Josh Mahoney on Tuesday to discuss score reviews, with the league agreeing to inform fans that umpires are merely following a directive to call for reviews any time the ball travels close to goal posts or there is any doubt about it crossing the goal line.
Goal umpires through the first four rounds were becoming frustrated at the growing perception that they had lost their confidence to make decisions they would have previously made.
So it’s another stupid directive by AFL
it’s not enough to review goals within the 30 seconds before centre bounce AFL want to stop game for minutes every time ball goes near posts or maybe touched by player
Farc then try to make a decision from SD blurry images What a bunch of amateurs running the AFL
I have been arguing for the fact that language matters in another thread so this may seem inconsistent but my view is that this sanction is excessive.
Will the sanction prevent others from “owning up” or will they now look to the afl for their guidance in how to “cover up”.I have been arguing for the fact that language matters in another thread so this may seem inconsistent but my view is that this sanction is excessive.
I hadn’t really followed the facts but after looking at them I think a lesser sanction should be fairer given he self reported and his remorse.
Players need to be educated and supported in a learning process with this stuff not smashed over the head with a brick.
Maybe he deserved a game and a fine but 3 weeks?
Unless there is something about it we don’t know.
Not sure what others think?
My issue, is how genuine is the remorse? Does he genuinely regret the comment, or is the remorse a means by which to have a lighter sanction.I have been arguing for the fact that language matters in another thread so this may seem inconsistent but my view is that this sanction is excessive.
I hadn’t really followed the facts but after looking at them I think a lesser sanction should be fairer given he self reported and his remorse.
Players need to be educated and supported in a learning process with this stuff not smashed over the head with a brick.
Maybe he deserved a game and a fine but 3 weeks?
Unless there is something about it we don’t know.
Not sure what others think?
The next bloke who does this will likely -Will the sanction prevent others from “owning up” or will they now look to the afl for their guidance in how to “cover up”.
I shouldn’t be, but I’m somewhat perplexed with how the afl operate. This is raised in public, so the “optics” may mean; more than the actual incident. I’m not sure.
But then the afl actively encourages players to lie about sustaining an injury if they believe they may have residual drugs in their system come match day.
Are they really the social judge, jury and sentencing authority on all things? Or only those that cast their entertainment business in a poor light. To keep their coffers flowing with taxpayer money, sponsorships and other cash coming in they need to be seen to be a leading light on society’s issues.
As usual too many inconsistencies with this mob. I may be excused for being somewhat cynical.
One thing is definitely right Willo… you shouldn’t be perplexed !!! I think most of us confused by the AFLWill the sanction prevent others from “owning up” or will they now look to the afl for their guidance in how to “cover up”.
I shouldn’t be, but I’m somewhat perplexed with how the afl operate. This is raised in public, so the “optics” may mean; more than the actual incident. I’m not sure.
But then the afl actively encourages players to lie about sustaining an injury if they believe they may have residual drugs in their system come match day.
Are they really the social judge, jury and sentencing authority on all things? Or only those that cast their entertainment business in a poor light. To keep their coffers flowing with taxpayer money, sponsorships and other cash coming in they need to be seen to be a leading light on society’s issues.
As usual too many inconsistencies with this mob. I may be excused for being somewhat cynical.
I believe he apologised then and there to the player once he realised what he’d said. He’s never tried to downplay his words or the context.My issue, is how genuine is the remorse? Does he genuinely regret the comment, or is the remorse a means by which to have a lighter sanction.
But, it was a fine and suspended suspension for the first time this matter had been brought before the AFL. Blatantly obvious warning to everyone else involved in the comp that maybe the AFL might kick arse if anyone happened to notice that this issue might arise again in future. It's all just blokey, matey, heat of the moment, on field footy stuff as long as no-one's paying attention, just ask Kotchy. He knows what it's all about.In this case Marsh is completely right, where the hell was the suspension for Clarkson
How does one measure another’s genuineness?My issue, is how genuine is the remorse? Does he genuinely regret the comment, or is the remorse a means by which to have a lighter sanction.
Easy. If ya do the wrong thing n dob yourself in, apologise n make amends before anyone knows ya done the wrong thing. Then you're genuine.How does one measure another’s genuineness?
I hadn’t really followed the facts but after looking at them I think a lesser sanction should be fairer given he self reported and his remorse.
Agree. The goal review has made game much worse to watch. As has the stand rule.I miss the days when the goal umps were allowed to live with their decision without a review